Gorsuch confirmation hearings underway
In addition to the excitement surrounding PLF’s Supreme Court oral argument today in Murr v. Wisconsin, today is also the day the Senate Judiciary Committee begins its hearings on the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.
The Senate Committee hearing will be a multi-day affair, lasting from today through at least Wednesday.
Reminding us all that political events have, as their chief purpose, drawing attention to politicians rather than the real subject matter, today’s portion of the hearing will be almost entirely consumed with Senators on the Committee making statements, before Judge Gorsuch is introduced and makes his opening statement. Today will conclude with Judge Gorsuch’s statement, and then Committee members will put their questions to the nominee starting tomorrow. Each Senator on the Committee will have two opportunities to ask questions. It is presently expected that questions will begin and conclude tomorrow, but it is possible that they will continue into Wednesday.
Following questions to the Judge, several panels of witnesses will present comments to the Committee, offering their view of Judge Gorsuch. This should take the balance of the day on Wednesday, after which we expect the actual hearing to conclude.
Once the hearing concludes, the Committee members will have a week or two to consider the nomination before voting. Chairman Charles Grassley (R – Iowa) anticipates that the Committee will vote on whether to move Judge Gorsuch’s nomination to the Floor on April 3 if not sooner. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has announced his expectation that the full Senate will vote on Judge Gorsuch’s nomination by the end of that week, on April 7 at the latest.
We will be monitoring and reporting on the confirmation process as it proceeds. You can listen to our podcast on the Gorsuch nomination below, and read my op ed in the San Francisco Daily Journal on the topic here as well.
What to read next
Shed a (crocodile) tear for Luke Skywalker today, as Mark Hamill’s much ballyhooed Autograph Law is set to be undone and reformed by the same California officials who made the mistake to pass it in the first place. AB 228 has arrived at the Governor’s desk, and in all likelihood will be signed into law any day.
Our new flagship publication, Sword&Scales, offers 16 pages of news and information to bring you up close to the vital work of our legal team. Our ardent defense of the right to own and use private property takes center stage in the inaugural issue. It’s at the core of our mission in the nation’s courts.
On Thursday, in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, PLF filed this reply brief in support of its cert petition to the Supreme Court of the United States. In this case, we’re representing Minnesota voters in a First Amendment challenge to a ban on political apparel at polling places.
The Daily Journal published my column on California Cannabis Coalition v. City of Upland, recently decided by the California Supreme Court. As the op-ed points out, the ruling undermines Proposition 218’s requirements that all new taxes at the local level need voter approval.