Polar bear saga continues … Part 2
Two weeks ago, we filed a petition in the D.C. Circuit Court asking the en banc court to rehear the panel decision that upheld the listing of the polar bear as a threatened species. That petition outlined three major errors in the panel’s decision: (1) that the Fish and Wildlife Service did not properly account for foreign conservation efforts; (2) that the Service did not explain how the polar bear satisfied the statutory definition for “threatened;” and, (3) that the Service used an improper standard in determining harm to the species. Yesterday, the court denied the rehearing request. This case will now be petitioned to the U.S. Supreme Court.
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›