Press Release

Supreme Court asked to review Michigan’s abusive foreclosure law

VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI; July 13, 2017:  Several small property owners are turning to the Supreme Court for help after they were victimized by Michigan’s abusive foreclosure law.  Filed today, their appeal — a petition for certiorari — asks the justices to review and strike down the Michigan General Property Tax Act, which allows local government to sell people’s property for delinquent taxes, and hoard any extra profits for itself.

“Michigan’s General Property Tax Act allows bureaucrats to take more than their due when they go after people for unpaid property taxes,” said Christina Martin, attorney with Pacific Legal Foundation, which represents the petitioners in appealing to the Supreme Court.

“In other words, this law transforms the foreclosure process into an engine of government sanctioned theft in order to line government coffers.  That’s unjust and unconstitutional.”

Represented by PLF free of charge, the petitioners reflect a cross section of people owning property in Van Buren County, Michigan, during the last recession.  Wayside Church (based in Chicago) owned and operated a parcel in Van Buren County as a youth camp.  Myron Stahl owned a residential lot where he was building his retirement home.  Henderson Hodgens owned a 20-acre farm with a home.

All fell on hard times and were unable to pay their 2011 property taxes.  Van Buren County responded by invoking the Michigan General Property Tax Act to take and sell the properties.

In each case, the sale generated far more than the tax debt.  But rather than simply keep the amount needed to satisfy the debt and refund the remainder to the owners, the county pocketed all the proceeds.  All told, it garnered $274,850 in after-debt profits from the three sales.

Hodgens, a bus driver, owed $5,900 in back taxes, penalties, interest, and fees on his farm — the property where he grew up and which he always intended and hoped to keep.  He fell behind on taxes because of an injury.  He was shocked to learn not only that the county sold his property, but realized a windfall nearly eight times the amount of his tax debt, and didn’t refund him a penny of those excess proceeds.  Now he can point only to his old, broken-down tractor as a legacy:  “It’s something that reminds me of my dad, reminds me of my property,” he says.  “At least they can’t take this from me, I don’t think.”

As another example of the hard times that have befallen the victims, Wayside Church’s youth camp parcel was sold by Van Buren County for more than 12 times the tax debt of $16,500.   The church is struggling financially, and has desperate need of the more than $180,000 in excess profits that the county kept for itself.  “This case is our last hope,” said Reginald Hill, a church deacon.  “It is so good to know that PLF is looking out for us and fighting for us.  PLF is a real guardian of the people’s rights, and we are thankful.”

Federal courts should not shrink from righting unconstitutional wrongs

The current case challenges this government self-enrichment as an unconstitutional taking.  However, a three-judge panel of the 6th Circuit, on a 2-1 vote, declined even to consider this argument.  Citing a controversial Supreme Court procedural precedent known as Williamson County, the majority held that such takings lawsuits must begin in state court, not federal courts.

“These plaintiffs have had their constitutional property rights denied, and they should not have the doors of the federal courts shut in their faces,” said Martin.  “We are asking the Supreme Court to take this appeal, recognize that federal courts should be fully open to people seeking the protection of the Constitution, and issue a clear ruling that foreclosure cannot be abused to enrich government by impoverishing struggling property owners.”

“This case highlights PLF’s indispensable role in vindicating property rights and challenging bureaucratic injustice — especially when the victims lack the means to fight back on their own,” said PLF President and CEO Steven Anderson.  “It presents an unsavory picture of government operating like Robin Hood in reverse, taking advantage of vulnerable people in their time of greatest hardship.”

About Pacific Legal Foundation
Pacific Legal Foundation, America’s most powerful ally for justice, litigates in courts nationwide for limited government, property rights, and individual liberty.  PLF represents Wayside Church, Myron Stahl, and Henderson Hodgens free of charge, as with all its clients.

Case Attorneys

J. David Breemer

Senior Attorney

David (Dave) Breemer developed a passion for liberty while reading classics such as John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government and Thomas Paine’s The Rights of Man, as he pursued a … ›

View profile

Christina M. Martin

Attorney

Christina Martin is an attorney at PLF’s Florida office in Palm Beach Gardens. She litigates cases around the country to protect individual rights, property rights, and the rule of law.  … ›

View profile

Mark Miller

Senior Attorney

Mark Miller is a PLF Senior Attorney and manages PLF’s Florida office in Palm Beach Gardens. Mark’s work on behalf of property rights, the First Amendment, and our other constitutional … ›

View profile

Case Commentary

See all posts
Post

By Kate A. Pomeroy

Michigan’s foreclosure law: Efficient or unfair?

Taylor Popielarz of ABC57 News  (South Bend, IN) aired a terrific segment that questions whether or not Michigan’s foreclosure law is “efficient or unfair” We think you’ll agree the law is unfair even if it allows the government to efficiently take your property it doesn’t deserve

As you will recall, since last year, Christina Martin has been keeping you up to date on Michigan’s unjust, and unconstitutional foreclosure law in Wayside Church v Van Buren County Before PLF took over the direct representation of the victims of this unfair law, including Wayside Church, it filed an amicus brief to support them in the US Court of

Read more
Post

By Christina M. Martin

Groups ask Supreme Court to grant PLF’s petition in Wayside Church v. Van Buren County

This week several groups filed “friend of the court” briefs supporting PLF’s Supreme Court petition in Wayside Church v Van Buren County

Two of the amicus briefs—one by AARP and the other by the Buckeye Institute—focus on the need for the Court to review Michigan’s unjust tax foreclosure law Under this unjust and unconstitutional law, Van Buren County took Wayside Church’s property, sold it for $206,000 to pay around $16,750 in property taxes, penalties, fees, and interest The County then pocketed all of the remaining profit as a windfall Similarly, the county took the farm and home where Henderson Hodgens grew up, and sold it for $47,750 to pay

Read more
Post

By Christina M. Martin

Michigan turns foreclosure into a government self-enrichment machine

Today, National Review published my article discussing, Wayside Church v Van Buren County, PLF’s case challenging legalized theft in Michigan Michigan’s unjust property tax law allows local governments to steal from people who fall behind on their property taxes As I explain in the article,

Can the government take your home and all your equity in it if you fall behind on your property taxes or — like many people in Flint, Mich — refuse to pay your water bill? The state of Michigan and a handful of other states think so These states’ odd tax laws allow counties to take and sell tax-delinquent properties and keep all the

Read more