PLF Urges Washington State to Recognize the Viability of Temporary Takings Claims

Earlier this week, PLF attorneys filed an amicus brief urging the Washington Supreme Court to review the takings case, 10 North Washington Ave., LLC v. City of Richland. In 2008, … ›

Federal Circuit upholds takings decision in Arkansas Game & Fish

Earlier today, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its remand decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States, upholding the trial court’s conclusion that the Army Corps … ›

Cato Constitution Day Conference

Tuesday I had the good fortune to attend Cato’s Constitution Day Conference.  The conference consisted of several panels of legal experts discussing the leading liberty-related cases of the 2012 Supreme … ›

Inconsistent language = inconsistent justice

Earlier this week, I put the finishing touches on an article discussing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States. As you may recall, … ›

Arkansas Game & Fish did not overturn the well-settled physical takings test

Yesterday, PLF attorneys filed an amicus brief in the remand proceedings in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States. As you may recall, late last year, the U.S. Supreme … ›

Arkansas Game & Fish: buying unity at the expense of clarity?

Professor Ilya Somin, writing on the Volokh Conspiracy, praised today’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States as “a rare unanimous victory for property … ›

Important property rights victory in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States

In a major property rights decision, the United States Supreme Court today, in an 8-0 opinion, held that the Takings Clause of the U.S. Constitution protects against all government invasions … ›

More thoughts on the Arkansas Game & Fish Commission argument

Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in the temporary taking case, Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States (the transcript/audio can be found here).  The issue … ›

Thoughts about today’s oral argument in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission

Later today, I plan to post an update on the oral argument in the temporary taking case, Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States.  But, in the meantime, I … ›

Brand Logo for the blog page

PLF Urges Washington State to Recognize the Viability of Temporary Takings Claims

Earlier this week, PLF attorneys filed an amicus brief urging the Washington Supreme Court to review the takings case, 10 North Washington Ave., LLC v. City of Richland. In 2008, … ›

Federal Circuit upholds takings decision in Arkansas Game & Fish

Earlier today, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its remand decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States, upholding the trial court’s conclusion that the Army Corps … ›

Cato Constitution Day Conference

Tuesday I had the good fortune to attend Cato’s Constitution Day Conference.  The conference consisted of several panels of legal experts discussing the leading liberty-related cases of the 2012 Supreme … ›

Inconsistent language = inconsistent justice

Earlier this week, I put the finishing touches on an article discussing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States. As you may recall, … ›

Arkansas Game & Fish did not overturn the well-settled physical takings test

Yesterday, PLF attorneys filed an amicus brief in the remand proceedings in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States. As you may recall, late last year, the U.S. Supreme … ›

Arkansas Game & Fish: buying unity at the expense of clarity?

Professor Ilya Somin, writing on the Volokh Conspiracy, praised today’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States as “a rare unanimous victory for property … ›

Important property rights victory in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States

In a major property rights decision, the United States Supreme Court today, in an 8-0 opinion, held that the Takings Clause of the U.S. Constitution protects against all government invasions … ›

More thoughts on the Arkansas Game & Fish Commission argument

Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in the temporary taking case, Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States (the transcript/audio can be found here).  The issue … ›

Thoughts about today’s oral argument in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission

Later today, I plan to post an update on the oral argument in the temporary taking case, Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States.  But, in the meantime, I … ›

The Morning Docket

Stay up to date with the Morning Docket, a weekly highlight of PLF's best articles, videos, and podcasts.

PLF Urges Washington State to Recognize the Viability of Temporary Takings Claims

Earlier this week, PLF attorneys filed an amicus brief urging the Washington Supreme Court to review the takings case, 10 North Washington Ave., LLC v. City of Richland. In 2008, … ›

Federal Circuit upholds takings decision in Arkansas Game & Fish

Earlier today, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its remand decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States, upholding the trial court’s conclusion that the Army Corps … ›

Cato Constitution Day Conference

Tuesday I had the good fortune to attend Cato’s Constitution Day Conference.  The conference consisted of several panels of legal experts discussing the leading liberty-related cases of the 2012 Supreme … ›

Inconsistent language = inconsistent justice

Earlier this week, I put the finishing touches on an article discussing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States. As you may recall, … ›

Arkansas Game & Fish did not overturn the well-settled physical takings test

Yesterday, PLF attorneys filed an amicus brief in the remand proceedings in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States. As you may recall, late last year, the U.S. Supreme … ›

Arkansas Game & Fish: buying unity at the expense of clarity?

Professor Ilya Somin, writing on the Volokh Conspiracy, praised today’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States as “a rare unanimous victory for property … ›

Important property rights victory in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States

In a major property rights decision, the United States Supreme Court today, in an 8-0 opinion, held that the Takings Clause of the U.S. Constitution protects against all government invasions … ›

More thoughts on the Arkansas Game & Fish Commission argument

Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in the temporary taking case, Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States (the transcript/audio can be found here).  The issue … ›

Thoughts about today’s oral argument in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission

Later today, I plan to post an update on the oral argument in the temporary taking case, Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States.  But, in the meantime, I … ›

PLF Urges Washington State to Recognize the Viability of Temporary Takings Claims

Earlier this week, PLF attorneys filed an amicus brief urging the Washington Supreme Court to review the takings case, 10 North Washington Ave., LLC v. City of Richland. In 2008, … ›

Federal Circuit upholds takings decision in Arkansas Game & Fish

Earlier today, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its remand decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States, upholding the trial court’s conclusion that the Army Corps … ›

Cato Constitution Day Conference

Tuesday I had the good fortune to attend Cato’s Constitution Day Conference.  The conference consisted of several panels of legal experts discussing the leading liberty-related cases of the 2012 Supreme … ›

Inconsistent language = inconsistent justice

Earlier this week, I put the finishing touches on an article discussing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States. As you may recall, … ›

Arkansas Game & Fish did not overturn the well-settled physical takings test

Yesterday, PLF attorneys filed an amicus brief in the remand proceedings in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States. As you may recall, late last year, the U.S. Supreme … ›

Arkansas Game & Fish: buying unity at the expense of clarity?

Professor Ilya Somin, writing on the Volokh Conspiracy, praised today’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States as “a rare unanimous victory for property … ›

Important property rights victory in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States

In a major property rights decision, the United States Supreme Court today, in an 8-0 opinion, held that the Takings Clause of the U.S. Constitution protects against all government invasions … ›

More thoughts on the Arkansas Game & Fish Commission argument

Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in the temporary taking case, Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States (the transcript/audio can be found here).  The issue … ›

Thoughts about today’s oral argument in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission

Later today, I plan to post an update on the oral argument in the temporary taking case, Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States.  But, in the meantime, I … ›