Should Abigail Fisher's suit be mooted? (Answer: No.)

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fisher v. University of Texas today. As our regular readers know by now, this case concerns the University of Texas’ (UT) use of race in … ›

The gavel is down: the High Court is in session

As is its tradition, the Supreme Court began its new Term on the first Monday in October. In the weeks leading up to that day, many organizations host “preview” events … ›

PLF statement on Supreme Court’s ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin

(Pacific Legal Foundation submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in the Fisher case, in opposition to the race-based preferences in the University of Texas-Austin’s admissions program.) June … ›

Supreme Court issues Fisher opinion

The decision in Fisher has finally arrived.  In short the Supreme Court held that the Fifth Circuit (when it upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s racial preference policies admissions) … ›

Supreme Court cases we’re waiting for

It’s June, and that means Supreme Court season. Over the coming weeks we’ll be looking for decisions in some crucial cases involving constitutional protections for property rights, racial equality, and … ›

U.S. Supreme Court’s October calendar features two PLF amicus cases

The U.S. Supreme Court’s October calendar is shaping up to be another blockbuster for PLF.  Not only will the Court hear arguments in the challenge to the University of Texas … ›

The Supreme Court should overrule Grutter

Today, Pacific Legal Foundation filed its brief in the Supreme Court in Fisher v. University of Texas. As you know, PLF has been heavily involved in Fisher for almost three … ›

Quote of the day: Abigail Therstrom

From her interview with the Wall Street Journal: After the passage in 1996 of California’s Proposition 209, which banned the use of race and ethnicity in public university admissions in … ›

The University of Texas spends (an additional) $1 million on attorneys in Fisher

It has been widely reported that the University of Texas has decided to forgo representation from the Texas Attorney General’s Office in Fisher.  Instead, the University is going to spend $1 million … ›

Brand Logo for the blog page

Should Abigail Fisher's suit be mooted? (Answer: No.)

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fisher v. University of Texas today. As our regular readers know by now, this case concerns the University of Texas’ (UT) use of race in … ›

The gavel is down: the High Court is in session

As is its tradition, the Supreme Court began its new Term on the first Monday in October. In the weeks leading up to that day, many organizations host “preview” events … ›

PLF statement on Supreme Court’s ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin

(Pacific Legal Foundation submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in the Fisher case, in opposition to the race-based preferences in the University of Texas-Austin’s admissions program.) June … ›

Supreme Court issues Fisher opinion

The decision in Fisher has finally arrived.  In short the Supreme Court held that the Fifth Circuit (when it upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s racial preference policies admissions) … ›

Supreme Court cases we’re waiting for

It’s June, and that means Supreme Court season. Over the coming weeks we’ll be looking for decisions in some crucial cases involving constitutional protections for property rights, racial equality, and … ›

U.S. Supreme Court’s October calendar features two PLF amicus cases

The U.S. Supreme Court’s October calendar is shaping up to be another blockbuster for PLF.  Not only will the Court hear arguments in the challenge to the University of Texas … ›

The Supreme Court should overrule Grutter

Today, Pacific Legal Foundation filed its brief in the Supreme Court in Fisher v. University of Texas. As you know, PLF has been heavily involved in Fisher for almost three … ›

Quote of the day: Abigail Therstrom

From her interview with the Wall Street Journal: After the passage in 1996 of California’s Proposition 209, which banned the use of race and ethnicity in public university admissions in … ›

The University of Texas spends (an additional) $1 million on attorneys in Fisher

It has been widely reported that the University of Texas has decided to forgo representation from the Texas Attorney General’s Office in Fisher.  Instead, the University is going to spend $1 million … ›

The Morning Docket

Stay up to date with the Morning Docket, a weekly highlight of PLF's best articles, videos, and podcasts.

Should Abigail Fisher's suit be mooted? (Answer: No.)

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fisher v. University of Texas today. As our regular readers know by now, this case concerns the University of Texas’ (UT) use of race in … ›

The gavel is down: the High Court is in session

As is its tradition, the Supreme Court began its new Term on the first Monday in October. In the weeks leading up to that day, many organizations host “preview” events … ›

PLF statement on Supreme Court’s ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin

(Pacific Legal Foundation submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in the Fisher case, in opposition to the race-based preferences in the University of Texas-Austin’s admissions program.) June … ›

Supreme Court issues Fisher opinion

The decision in Fisher has finally arrived.  In short the Supreme Court held that the Fifth Circuit (when it upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s racial preference policies admissions) … ›

Supreme Court cases we’re waiting for

It’s June, and that means Supreme Court season. Over the coming weeks we’ll be looking for decisions in some crucial cases involving constitutional protections for property rights, racial equality, and … ›

U.S. Supreme Court’s October calendar features two PLF amicus cases

The U.S. Supreme Court’s October calendar is shaping up to be another blockbuster for PLF.  Not only will the Court hear arguments in the challenge to the University of Texas … ›

The Supreme Court should overrule Grutter

Today, Pacific Legal Foundation filed its brief in the Supreme Court in Fisher v. University of Texas. As you know, PLF has been heavily involved in Fisher for almost three … ›

Quote of the day: Abigail Therstrom

From her interview with the Wall Street Journal: After the passage in 1996 of California’s Proposition 209, which banned the use of race and ethnicity in public university admissions in … ›

The University of Texas spends (an additional) $1 million on attorneys in Fisher

It has been widely reported that the University of Texas has decided to forgo representation from the Texas Attorney General’s Office in Fisher.  Instead, the University is going to spend $1 million … ›

Should Abigail Fisher's suit be mooted? (Answer: No.)

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fisher v. University of Texas today. As our regular readers know by now, this case concerns the University of Texas’ (UT) use of race in … ›

The gavel is down: the High Court is in session

As is its tradition, the Supreme Court began its new Term on the first Monday in October. In the weeks leading up to that day, many organizations host “preview” events … ›

PLF statement on Supreme Court’s ruling in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin

(Pacific Legal Foundation submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in the Fisher case, in opposition to the race-based preferences in the University of Texas-Austin’s admissions program.) June … ›

Supreme Court issues Fisher opinion

The decision in Fisher has finally arrived.  In short the Supreme Court held that the Fifth Circuit (when it upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s racial preference policies admissions) … ›

Supreme Court cases we’re waiting for

It’s June, and that means Supreme Court season. Over the coming weeks we’ll be looking for decisions in some crucial cases involving constitutional protections for property rights, racial equality, and … ›

U.S. Supreme Court’s October calendar features two PLF amicus cases

The U.S. Supreme Court’s October calendar is shaping up to be another blockbuster for PLF.  Not only will the Court hear arguments in the challenge to the University of Texas … ›

The Supreme Court should overrule Grutter

Today, Pacific Legal Foundation filed its brief in the Supreme Court in Fisher v. University of Texas. As you know, PLF has been heavily involved in Fisher for almost three … ›

Quote of the day: Abigail Therstrom

From her interview with the Wall Street Journal: After the passage in 1996 of California’s Proposition 209, which banned the use of race and ethnicity in public university admissions in … ›

The University of Texas spends (an additional) $1 million on attorneys in Fisher

It has been widely reported that the University of Texas has decided to forgo representation from the Texas Attorney General’s Office in Fisher.  Instead, the University is going to spend $1 million … ›