Articles

Would you prefer a passive judiciary?

February 10, 2015 | By TIMOTHY SANDEFUR

Reason has published my column responding to the hubbub surrounding Sen. Rand Paul’s remarks (and Cass Sunstein’s) about “judicial activism” and “judicial restraint.” Here’s a taste: Senator Rand Paul’s recent remarks about “judicial restraint” have shaken up both left and right, but any ...

Articles

The discussion over judicial activism continues at Cato Unbound

February 19, 2014 | By TIMOTHY SANDEFUR

Kermit Roosevelt, David Upham, Sandhya Bathija and I are still mixing it up on the subject of judicial activism and judicial restraint over at Cato Unbound. My latest post, “Rational Basis Scrutiny Is Just A Stupid Rock,” is available here. … ...

Articles

Georgia Supreme Court goes out of its way to find that cronyism is specifically enshrined in the Georgia Constitution

October 17, 2012 | By PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION

Courts typically avoid ruling on constitutional issues unless it is necessary to decide a case. There are several reasons for this practice, not the least of which is that ruling on controversial constitutional matters when the case can be resolved on less controversial statutory grounds can make the court look political, or lend credence to ̷ ...

Articles

O'Reilly right that Robert's opinion was an example of judicial restraint; wrong that we should forgive it for that reason

July 06, 2012 | By PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION

This week Fox News personality Bill O’Reilly rightly pointed out that Justice Robert’s opinion upholding the individual mandate under the taxing power could be construed as a conservative opinion.  However, Bill went on to imply that Justice Robert’s opinion should be forgiven as merely a mistaken application of a strain of con ...

Articles

From activism to abdication : The Ninth Circuit upholds a law protecting ophthalmologists from legitimate competition.

June 20, 2012 | By PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION

Over the years, the Ninth Circuit has developed a reputation in some circles for Judicial Activism (i.e. substituting its opinion for that of the legislature in matters that are none of its concern). However, last week the court’s opinion in National Association of Optometrists v. Harris showed that it is just as apt at avoiding … ...

Articles

There’s nothing activist about saying government must play by the rules.

June 06, 2012 | By PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION

Recently, bloggers and even the Texas Land Commissioner were decrying several Texas Supreme Court Justices for their “extreme activism” in ruling in favor of property owners in Severance v. Patterson. What was the reason for this outrage? Simple: the Court found that if the state wished to declare that Mrs. Severance’s private pr ...

Articles

President Obama shouldn’t pick a fight with the courts

April 23, 2012 | By TIMOTHY SANDEFUR

Cato’s Ilya Shapiro and I have an article on Forbes.com about President Obama’s recent comments that “activist” judges shouldn’t strike down the Individual Mandate: Everyone disagrees with Supreme Court decisions from time to time.  But Americans understand that majorities are not always right, and that our Court play ...

Articles

Obama Administration letter brief on judicial review

April 05, 2012 | By TIMOTHY SANDEFUR

Here is the letter brief that the Obama Administration was required to file in response to questions about the President’s comments regarding judicial review. … ...