The X2 Files
Author: Brandon Middleton
With tomorrow's X2 hearing fast-approaching, I thought I would take this opportunity to re-post some of the filings that have been made in the past several days by the various parties.
Recall that on August 31 Judge Wanger enjoined the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Fall X2 action. The Service and defendant-intervenor Natural Resources Defense Council both appealed the injunction to the Ninth Circuit, and in the meantime they have asked Judge Wanger to stay (i.e., suspend) his injunction pending the appeal.
The Coalition for a Sustainable Delta, Kern County Water Agency, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, State Water Contractors, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, and Westlands Water District oppose the stay requests, as does the California Department of Water Resources. The water users' opposition to the Service's stay request may be found here.
The waters users' declarations in support of their opposition to the Service stay request may be found here, here, here, and here. The next-to-last linked declaration includes two sets of exhibits: 1, 2. The last linked declaration includes three sets of exhibits: 1, 2, 3.
The water users' opposition to NRDC's stay request may be found here.
Disclosure: PLF attorneys represent three almond and pistachio growers who are plaintiffs in this litigation, support the oppositions to the stay requests, but have not submitted any legal filings related to the injunction at issue.
What to read next
PLF asks the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that there is no “legislative exception” to the unconstitutional conditions doctrine
It seems that some governments and courts prefer to treat Supreme Court precedent as an option, rather than a requirement. The Supreme Court has ruled—twice—that it’s unconstitutional for government to … ›