Victory for economic liberty in Missouri!
This afternoon, at the instigation of PLF’s lawsuit, Missouri Governor Jay Nixon signed legislation repealing that state’s oppressive licensing law for moving companies. Under the old law, a person applying for permission to operate a moving company was required to submit to a licensing scheme under which existing moving companies were given the privilege of basically vetoing the application. We challenged that law on behalf of St. Louis entrepreneur Michael Munie, and argued the case in federal district court in April. But in the meantime, state lawmakers passed legislation repealing the law, and this afternoon, Governor Nixon signed that bill, thus opening the road for economic opportunity in the Show Me State.
Laws like the Missouri licensing law—called “certificate of necessity” laws—exist on the books in most states, regulating a wide variety of industries. Yet these laws do not even purport to protect consumers; they exist solely to protect established industries against fair competition form outsiders. As I explained in Regulation magazine some time ago, the Constitution forbids laws that restrict economic liberty simply to provide monopoly privileges to established companies. It’s time that all certificate of necessity laws were abolished. Missouri has joined Oregon in taking an important step toward guaranteeing the right to earn a living.
I want particularly to thank four people not affiliated with PLF without whom this could not have been accomplished: Missouri-based free market activists Bruce Hillis and Ron Calzone pushed for this bill to be passed, just as concerned citizens wanting the best for their state. State Representative Eric Burlison drafted and sponsored the legislation, and the Reason Foundation’s Adrian Moore offered invaluable services as an expert witness in this litigation. I am grateful for their help.
What to read next
Justice Don Willett of the Texas Supreme Court endured the partisan gauntlet of the Senate hearing on his nomination to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. The hearing only confirmed what has been known for some time: Justice Willett will serve the federal judiciary with integrity, wit, and commitment.
Earlier this year, the City of Seattle shocked the people of Washington—indeed, many across the nation—when it decided to impose an income tax on so-called “high-earners” in direct defiance of the Washington State Supreme Court, which has repeatedly held that the state constitution’s uniformity clause prohibits targeted income taxes.
PLF and several allied organizations submitted a petition for rule-making to the federal agencies that administer the Endangered Species Act. The petition asks the agencies to define “species” and “subspecies,” terms which, although critical to the Act’s operation, are left undefined by statute and regulation.
Next Friday, I’ll be presenting oral argument in the Ninth Circuit in Cedar Point Nursery v. Gould. The case involves a challenge to the ALRB’s access regulation, which allows union organizers to use the private property of agricultural employers to solicit potential union members.