SCOTUS Scoop

The Court. The cases. The Constitution.

If you like your government small and your courts accountable, this is your inbox fix.

A newsletter by Anastasia Boden

Anastasia Boden has a thing for liberty—and a borderline obsessive relationship with the Supreme Court. While most people unplug with Netflix and a glass of wine, she’s devouring SCOTUS transcripts and tracking how the Justices are reshaping your rights. Her newsletter, SCOTUS Scoop, delivers sharp, liberty-forward takes on the Court’s biggest decisions—every other Thursday, with just the right mix of brains and bite.

What You’ll Get:

  • Court Watch: The biggest SCOTUS cases broken down in plain English
  • Liberty Lens: What these rulings mean for your constitutional rights
  • Sharp Analysis: From an experienced litigator who’s been in the fight
New year, new SCOTUS opinions

New year, new SCOTUS opinions

The Supreme Court has issued its first handful (or scoop, if you will) of opinions. And it heard oral arguments in one of the most closely watched cases of the term. But first, the bad news. On Monday, the Court rejected six PLF petitions for review: Hierholzer...

read more
Why can’t we hold rights violators accountable?

Why can’t we hold rights violators accountable?

Are you still full from Thanksgiving? Here’s a scoop of SCOTUS to go with your leftover mashed potatoes. Why can’t we hold rights violators accountable? The Court recently heard arguments in the case of a man whose dreadlocks were forcibly shaved—contrary to his...

read more
Guns, drugs, and ghosts of doctrines past 

Guns, drugs, and ghosts of doctrines past 

Happy Halloween, SCOTUS lovers. Need a last-minute costume? Don’t want to be Taylor “Swift Justice?” Go as “The Dissenter.” All black robe, dramatic lace jabot à la RBG, and add fake blood on a scroll for Halloween flair. You are now: “When your dissent was so good,...

read more
The justices and I are back

The justices and I are back

Bust out your pumpkin spice lattes and pocket Constitutions. It’s October, which means the justices (and I) are back. What can you expect this term? Extra pumpkin spice. We’re getting cases involving conversion therapy, trans athletes in sports, and executive power....

read more
Judges should judge

Judges should judge

The term hath endeth! The justices are slathering on the SPF, teaching classes in Italy, gallivanting in their RVs, and doing whatever else it is that the justices do for the summer. Justices, they’re just like us—but with robes. After this scoop of SCOTUS, we’ll have...

read more
Faux diversity, real grift

Faux diversity, real grift

**Non-Opinion Opinion Watch ** The Supreme Court released its opinion in a highly anticipated case about whether a group could become the nation’s first religious charter school. Unfortunately, the case ended with a whimper, not a bang: Justice Barrett recused...

read more
The Supreme Court has to decide at some point. Why not now?

The Supreme Court has to decide at some point. Why not now?

The Quiet Disappointments of Justice David Souter Former Supreme Court Justice David Souter has passed away. In my latest for the Daily Journal, I reflect on his tenure. Justice Souter’s modesty, humility, and deference made him well-liked by others on the bench but...

read more
Can the government bust into your home with impunity? 

Can the government bust into your home with impunity? 

A lot of interesting developments. Thus, much like the Ninth Amendment, the inclusion of certain court orders, opinions, or oral arguments is not meant to deny or disparage the existence of others. There’s just only so much space per scoop. Mo’ cases, mo’ problems The...

read more

Join thousands of readers who care about the Constitution—and don’t have time to read 80-page opinions.

It’s free. It’s fierce. It’s every other Thursday. Sign up now.

Pacific Legal Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. © Pacific Legal Foundation, 2025. Privacy Policy