An owner’s right to be secure in his or her private property is only as safe as the government’s—most importantly the judiciary’s—fealty to what the Supreme Court describes as “settled expectations” of land title."
May 20, 2025
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
"The right to receive information is a recognized corollary to the right to speak."
June 12, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States
“The Sixth Circuit assumed both (1) that Nancy Berryhill had already been validly appointed as an officer of the United States at the time she purportedly became acting commissioner of Social Security; and (2) that an inferior officer of the United States can be directed to serve as an acting officer in another position without a new, constitutionally compliant appointment as an officer.”
March 17, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States
“The Telecommunications Act hands the power to tax to the Federal Communications Commission—an ‘independent’ agency that was intentionally designed to be as unaccountable to the people as possible.”
February 18, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States
“Arthrex requires that the official making these decisions be appointed as a principal officer. Since they are not, the Task Force members are unconstitutionally appointed.”
March 27, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States
“As Colorado River itself acknowledged in an oft-quoted line, federal courts have a “virtually unflag-ging obligation” to exercise their jurisdiction.”
May 14, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States
“State records document a widespread problem as counties confiscate millions of dollars that should have been remitted as just compensation for taking the property above and beyond the tax debt owed.”
May 02, 2025
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
“Zoning boards are entrusted with the limited power to decide land use applications, not to sit in judgment over their own final decisions.”
April 23, 2025
Supreme Court of Indiana
“Rather than serving as a tool to prevent and remedy sex-based discrimination in education, the proportionality prong often functions as a sex-based quota which results in athletic opportunities being limited for all students.”
May 01, 2025
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit