Supreme Court affirms that you get to decide who can and can’t access your property.
To distract from failing public schools, Mayor de Blasio set his sights on racial balancing at elite high schools, to benefit some races at the expense of others. Equality before the law demands better.
We are a nation of creators, inventors, builders, and entrepreneurs. The only way to recover from this crisis is to unleash our productive energy.
We give them their day in court to vindicate their rights and set a lasting precedent for everyone else.
Find Out More
We’ve won 13 victories at the United States Supreme Court, and we’re just getting started.
Dispatches from the front lines in the fight for freedom.
At PLF, we believe in individual liberty: that when people are free to live peacefully and productively, without interference by government, they improve themselves, their families, and their communities.
We represent hundreds of clients each year, free of charge.
Learn More
The right to acquire and use property without undue government interference
The right to freely express yourself in speech and thought
The right to earn an honest living and make free economic choices
Equal treatment under the law, regardless of sex, race, creed, color, or other differences
The structural protections of our Constitution, which safeguard our individual liberty
The Supreme Court delivers a victory for property rights in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a victory for property owners with their decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid. The Supreme Court affirmed that the government cannot force people to allow third parties to trespass on their property. In 2015, union activists stormed Cedar Point Nursery to harass the farm workers … ...
Tiegs v. Vilsack
Race-based COVID-19 farm loan forgiveness denies equal treatment to farmers and ranchers across the country
When the pandemic struck, much of the U.S. agriculture industry felt the financial crunch. Julie Owen, James Tiegs, Abraham and Cally Jergenson, and Chad Ward were initially encouraged when Congress passed a COVID-19 relief law that included a farm loan forgiveness provision for economic hardship. But they each discovered that they are ineligible f ...
Hanke and Yoo v. Secretary Cardona
Educrats can’t ignore oversight board members appointed by the previous administration
In the final months of the previous administration, the president appointed several people to serve on the National Board for Education Sciences (NBES)—a board that advises officials within the agency on research and funding priorities. But the U.S. Department of Education refuses to deliver the appointees’ signed commissions, which are pro ...
Dunlap v. Vilsack
Race-based COVID-19 farm loan forgiveness denies equal treatment to Oregon farmer
Katie and James Dunlap are farmers in Oregon who both work two jobs in addition to raising their toddler. The couple rent land from his parents where they raise cattle and hay—an endeavor that required two farm loans to buy cattle and equipment. Like many other farmers, the Dunlaps were negatively affected by COVID and were relieved when they hea ...
Judicial deference isn’t just a hot topic at the federal level. In fact, many states are leading a revolution against administrative deference doctrines. In recent years, at least six states have rejected deference through judicial rulings, two have done so through legislation or referendum, and still other states have taken skeptical intermediate …
The fight to protect liberty and justice never ends. Since 1973, donor-supported PLF has successfully litigated to enforce the Constitution’s guarantee of individual liberty, with an unmatched track record at the U.S. Supreme Court. Your support empowers countless Americans to fight back and win, at the same time you safeguard the liberties of everyone.
Contact Plf Donate
