If the challenged executive orders in the four underlying cases were allowed to stand, the precedent would jeopardize the ability of amici, and any other litigant, to seek redress in the courts from unlawful government infringement on individual rights. Such an outcome cannot be abided.
April 02, 2026
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit
Salina’s mural-sign regime is an unconstitutional content- and speaker-based restriction that cannot be saved by an appeal to aesthetic regulation.
April 01, 2026
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Whether a party can pay a fine will, in most cases, turn on the aggregate fine imposed instead of the per violation amount. So, naturally, an ability to pay analysis must consider the aggregate fine amount along with the per violation amount... The danger is especially apparent in property cases where owners who can’t afford to make repairs are treated as if every single day is a new violation and fined accordingly. While $100 per day for chipping paint might be affordable on day one (the first violation), few people could afford it on day 100.
March 30, 2026
Supreme Court of the State of Washington
After nearly a century of federal decisions routinely upholding what seem like unfettered delegations, it is imperative that this Court take a case to clarify that the nondelegation doctrine is alive and enforceable in the 21st century.
March 27, 2026
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court should grant the petition to address how listeners’ rights can inform the often confounding distinction between content-neutral and content-based expression.
March 12, 2026
Supreme Court of the United States
The First Amendment does not stop at the schoolhouse gate. In our increasingly polarized world, teachers, no less than students, deserve the protection of the First Amendment.
March 11, 2026
Supreme Court of the United States
[I]n deciding for itself whether ratification was a “disfavored” or “improper” sort of retroactivity, the Wille panel usurped Congress’s role. This panel should not follow suit.
March 10, 2026
Supreme Court of the United States
The elements essential to traditional causation—foreseeability, directness, proportionality, and individualized proof—cannot be satisfied by climate change litigation as [the youth plaintiffs represented by the organization "Our Children's Trust"] attempt here. The distance between individual energy policies and alleged climate harms erodes any meaningful causal connection under centuries of common law precedent.
March 05, 2026
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
With politicians and government agencies continuously devising new ways to collect, store, aggregate, and search individuals’ selectively shared private information, the time for [the Supreme] Court to affirm Fourth Amendment protections is at hand.
March 02, 2026
Supreme Court of the United States