If a non-delegation limit exists, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act crosses it by transferring to the President a near-total legislative power—decisions about the “important subjects”—explicitly vested in Congress by the People. The Court should say so.
October 24, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States
If the government takes away a property owner’s fundamental right to exclude, in whole or in part, it is a categorical physical taking that is contrary to the Fifth Amendment without regard to any other facts or circumstances. While the lack of available housing may be a public problem, these private property owners cannot be singled out to bear the burden of fixing it. The trial court’s decision should be affirmed.
October 17, 2025
U.S. Court of Appeal of the State of California, First Appellate District
The Court should return to first principles, hold that the President has authority to remove principal executive officers at will, so that, consistent with the Constitution, the President has an effective check against Congress’s broad delegations of power to Executive Branch agencies.
October 17, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States
New York's All-Electric Buildings Act requires most new buildings to be all-electric— effectively disallowing the installation of fossil-fuel equipment, including natural gas and propane infrastructure. [Mulhern] sued, arguing that the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) preempted the state law. A ruling in Mulhern’s favor would be consistent with the statutory text and correct the flawed policy arguments advanced by the opponents of EPCA preemption, guiding future courts to focus on the EPCA itself.
October 10, 2025
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
While Section 2 still protects individuals from voting discrimination based on their race, it cannot constitutionally be read to protect group rights. Therefore, a State should not be entitled to rely on Section 2 to justify race-based redistricting.
September 24, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States
"[T]he Seventh Amendment is a constitutional protection against arbitrary government power. And critically, it is a limit on the permissible structure of an adjudicatory body—if the Seventh Amendment jury trial right applies to a claim, it must be tried in an Article III court."
September 10, 2025
D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
“By granting Okello Chatrie’s petition, this Court can clear up the confusion about two issues, helping ensure uniform Fourth Amendment protection for sensitive data belonging to users of services which have become integral to our specialized, technologically advanced economy.”
August 29, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States
August 28, 2025
Supreme Court of the United States
This Court should consent to jurisdiction to resolve whether general administrative warrants may issue. By expressly overruling Price as inconsistent with modern precedent, rooting Article I, § 14 in its common-law preference for specific warrants, and prioritizing the liberty interests at their zenith in the home, [the Ohio Supreme Court] can ensure Ohioans’ constitutional protections exceed the federal floor set by Camara.
August 11, 2025
Supreme Court of Ohio