"This Court should hold that S3292 is a content-based speech restriction. Otherwise, government may be emboldened to burden more speech and restrict yet more advice offered by various professionals to willing clients."
April 03, 2024
Third Circuit Court of Appeals
West Virginia’s statute muzzles truthful professional speech because consumers might respond with poor choices. We ask the Supreme Court to halt this prior restraint.
September 21, 2022
Supreme Court of the United States
On behalf of PLF Client Prof. Elizabeth Weiss, PLF tells the Fourth Circuit that academics should be allowed to prove their claims when institutions retaliate against them for their speech or opinions.
September 06, 2023
United States Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit
Nominal damages ensure more than symbolic vindication of constitutional rights
September 25, 2020
Supreme Court of the United States
Liberating workers from compulsory unionism
July 01, 2017
Supreme Court of the United States
San Francisco’s tactics in its war on soda violate the First Amendment
August 03, 2016
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
California unconstitutionally imposes mandatory arbitration for labor contracts in the agricultural sector
May 16, 2015
California Supreme Court