Briefing nearing completion in gnatcatcher challenge
This week we filed our final trial court brief in our challenge to the Endangered Species Act listing of the coastal California gnatcatcher. We argue that the gnatcatcher should not be listed as a distinct “subspecies.” The Service and the environmental intervenors contend that the listing should be upheld because the Service used the best available data to affirm the gnatcatcher’s separate subspecies status. But as our reply brief explains, this evidentiary defense misses the point: whatever the value of any particular study or set of data, the Service must still articulate and apply to the data a standard for subspecies diagnosis. Here, the Service failed to do that, instead simply citing “differences” between the coastal California gnatcatcher and other plentiful gnatcatcher populations in Mexico. But that defense fails too, because the purported “differences” are so slight that one could, using that standard of difference, arbitrarily propose any number of overlapping gnatcatcher subspecies.
Briefing in the case will be complete by the end of October, and we hope for a decision not too long thereafter.
learn more about
Center for Environmental Science, Accuracy & Reliability, et al. v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al.
The federal government has expanded its reach using the Endangered Species Act to cover spurious “subspecies.” The ESA does not define “subspecies” and the Fish and Wildlife Service has offered no definition of its own. Instead, it simply announces when it has determined a “subspecies” to exist and, relying on the subspecies’ smaller numbers relative to the entire species, imposes onerous regulations. The California gnatcatcher was listed as a threatened subspecies, but a 2013 study shows that, at a DNA level, the songbird is not meaningfully distinct from millions of gnatcatchers dwelling in Baja California. PLF represents a coalition of property owners, developers, and scientists in a challenge to the continued listing of this thriving species.Read more
What to read next
The National Mall and Memorial Parks are “the premier national civic space for public gatherings including First Amendment activities, national celebrations … and national mourning.” In these venues, “the constitutional … ›
Originally published by Investor’s Business Daily October 12, 2018. Although Congress deserves its share of criticism for the myriad rules governing our lives, the dozens (if not hundreds) of administrative … ›
Originally published by Investor Business Daily October 12, 2018. Regulatory reform is a hot topic nowadays, and no wonder. The size and expense of the federal administrative state are staggering. … ›