Court Thows Out Another Attempt To Silence Critics of Eminent Domain
by Timothy Sandefur
You're familiar with the frivolous lawsuit filed by Texas developer H. Walker Royall against Carla Main, the author of the excellent book Bulldozed. (The book chronicles an egregious example of eminent domain abuse in which Royall was deeply involved; you can read my review of the book here.) Well, Royall isn't the only one trying to sue critics of eminent domain abuse into silence, in blatant disregard of the First Amendment. Richard Swift and Wayne Wilkinson, public officials in Clarksville, Tennessee, sued critics of a redevelopment project who ran an ad in the local paper criticizing the project. That case has now been thrown out. "Accusing a public official or public figure of using their political influence to obtain a benefit for others or of themselves or favoring their supporters is not defamation," said the judge. "Debate on public issues shall be uninhibited, wide open and generally do include, vehement, caustic and unpleasant attacks on the character of government officials."
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›