Is breaching the dams in the Pacific Northwest a good idea?
Author: Damien M. Schiff
So argues author Paul VanDevelder this week in the Los Angeles Times. Van Develder refers to Judge James Redden's recent letter to the federal defendants in National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service (noted on this blog) that, if renewed federal efforts to restore depleted salmon populations in the Pacific Northwest fail, the judge may order the breaching of dams along the Snake River. (See here for earlier Times coverage). Suffice it to say, Mr. VanDevelder's description of those dams as "economic sinkholes, which produce less than 3% of the region's power, do nothing for flood control, irrigate only a handful of big farms and subsidize transportation costs (at the expense of taxpayers and salmon) for wheat farmers in Idaho and eastern Washington" is rather tendentious.
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›