Lucas at 25 podcast
I’ll be doing a Federalist Society podcast today on Lucas at 25.
This spring marks the 25th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council. In Lucas, a 5-4 Court majority held that a state law can effect a “regulatory taking” and trigger inverse condemnation requirements if it deprives an owner of all viable uses of his land. Join our panel to hear a discussion of questions such as: Did Lucas mark a major change in Supreme Court regulatory takings doctrine? Was the decision about right, or did it go too far or not far enough? Is Lucas still relevant to regulatory takings law today, and what are the chances that the decision might be reconsidered or extended?
- James S. Burling, Vice President for Litigation, Pacific Legal Foundation
- Professor Eric R. Claeys, Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law School
- Professor Michael A. Wolf, Professor of Law, Richard E. Nelson Chair in Local Government, University of Florida Levin College of Law
Call begins at 1:30 p.m. Eastern Time.
What to read next
PLF asks the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that there is no “legislative exception” to the unconstitutional conditions doctrine
It seems that some governments and courts prefer to treat Supreme Court precedent as an option, rather than a requirement. The Supreme Court has ruled—twice—that it’s unconstitutional for government to … ›