Plan Bay Area oped
Yesterday, the Washington Times published an oped I co-authored with Randall O’Toole of the Cato Institute. Entitled provocatively, “Do single-family homes threaten the planet?“, Mr. O’Toole and I take aim at the foolish premise of Plan Bay Area and other instances of the new urbanism. We argue that there are many much more cost-effective means to reduce greenhouse gas emissions than to adopt an urban planning model that forces people to live in “stack and pack” development and to give up their personal commuting vehicles. Our arguments in the oped are consistent with our lawsuit, Bay Area Citizens v. Association of Bay Area Governments, which challenges Plan Bay Area on the ground that its stack-and-pack approach is unnecessary to achieve state-mandated greenhouse gas emissions.
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›