Plan Bay Area oped
Yesterday, the Washington Times published an oped I co-authored with Randall O’Toole of the Cato Institute. Entitled provocatively, “Do single-family homes threaten the planet?“, Mr. O’Toole and I take aim at the foolish premise of Plan Bay Area and other instances of the new urbanism. We argue that there are many much more cost-effective means to reduce greenhouse gas emissions than to adopt an urban planning model that forces people to live in “stack and pack” development and to give up their personal commuting vehicles. Our arguments in the oped are consistent with our lawsuit, Bay Area Citizens v. Association of Bay Area Governments, which challenges Plan Bay Area on the ground that its stack-and-pack approach is unnecessary to achieve state-mandated greenhouse gas emissions.
What to read next
Don’t know how to identify every one of the 1,500 endangered species? This group wants to throw you in prison.
Ok, that’s a slight overstatement. But not as much of one as you would think. Activist group WildEarth Guardians apparently dreams of a world in which people can be thrown … ›
PLF scored another victory against bureaucratic overreach yesterday, when the federal court in Alaska dismissed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Congressional Review Act. This dismissal is PLF’s latest success … ›