PLF hosts discussion on occupational licensing reform in California
On April 20th, PLF will host an event on occupational licensing reform in California. Author Dick Carpenter will talk about his book Bottleneckers, followed by a panel discussion featuring state Senator John Moorlach, and me.
Bottleneckers describes the phenomenon whereby interest groups harness government power to limit competition. Occupational licensing is one of the most egregious examples; today, nearly 2/3 of Americans need government permission in the form of a license just to do their job. Yet many licensing requirements have no relationship to protecting public safety, and instead exist for the simple purpose of protecting existing businesses from new competition. PLF’s Economic Liberty Project is devoted to fighting such laws in courts across the nation.
Senator Moorlach has sponsored Senate Bill 247, which would deregulate various professions that patently need not be licensed.
In California, hearing aid fitters, makeup artists, upholsterers, and auctioneers are all required to have a license, stifling economic opportunity for people who wish to pursue these professions. Yet study after study has shown, that occupational licensing often denies people entry into their chosen field without any corresponding benefit to the public. Indeed, by driving up the cost of doing business and restricting the number of workers, occupational licensing laws often artificially raise prices, and deprive consumers of choices.
Please join our event for an invigorating discussion about potential reform for government abuse. Not to mention, the first 10 to RSVP get a free copy of Bottleneckers!
learn more about
Fontenot v. Hunter, Attorney General of Oklahoma
Peggy Fontenot is an award-winning American Indian photographer and artist, specializing in hand-made beaded jewelry and cultural items. A member of Virginia’s Patawomeck tribe, she has made her living for 30 years traveling the country to show and sell her American Indian art. She regularly participated in Oklahoma art festivals until local, politically-connected tribes convinced the state legislature to restrict the definition of “Indian tribe” to include only those tribes recognized by the federal government. The restriction was ostensibly to prevent the marketing and sale of art fraudulently described as “American Indian-made.” However, as a result of this law, Ms. Fontenot – a legitimate member of a state-recognized tribe – may no longer truthfully describe her art as “American Indian-made” in the state of Oklahoma.Read more
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›