PLF urges EPA to abandon the “conduit” theory
Today, PLF filed comments in response to an EPA request on whether the agency should abandon its support of the so-called “conduit” theory of Clean Water Act liability. The conduit theory has been used recently by a number of federal appellate and district courts to extend Clean Water Act liability to discharges of pollutants that reach regulated surface waters through groundwater. In our comment letter, we explain that the conduit theory unravels the Clean Water Act’s framework of “cooperative federalism” by extending direct federal regulation to what amounts to “nonpoint-source pollution,” i.e., the type of pollution that Congress intended to leave to the states and other non-federal entities to address and remedy. We also make the points that expanding direct federal regulation to groundwater pollution, under the aegis of a conduit or similar theory, will exacerbate the already significant burdens that the Clean Water Act puts on landowners, while also impeding more effective and efficient non-federal efforts to clean up polluted groundwater.
What to read next
Don’t know how to identify every one of the 1,500 endangered species? This group wants to throw you in prison.
Ok, that’s a slight overstatement. But not as much of one as you would think. Activist group WildEarth Guardians apparently dreams of a world in which people can be thrown … ›
PLF scored another victory against bureaucratic overreach yesterday, when the federal court in Alaska dismissed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Congressional Review Act. This dismissal is PLF’s latest success … ›