Federal lawsuit fights for freedom in hearing care and targets outdated hearing aid licensing scheme
Melbourne, Florida; April 20, 2018: Today, Pacific Legal Foundation announced a federal lawsuit challenging Florida’s hearing aid licensing rules. These regulations haven’t kept up with the times: they mandate outdated procedures and unnecessary training, which aren’t needed for today’s technologically sophisticated devices. All these rules do is reduce access and increase cost for people affected with hearing loss.
For 30 years, hearing aid specialist Dan Taylor has improved the lives of countless Floridians. Last year, Dan gave up his license on the grounds that federal rules on hearing aids should invalidate Florida’s onerous and outdated rules. He kept practicing but now is fighting for his right to keep working.
“The state slapped me with fines and a cease-and-desist order just because I followed federal rules instead of Florida’s rules,” said Dan. “How many people must be denied access to safe and affordable hearing aids—and a better quality of life?”
“The federal government has studied and determined that the type of hearing aids Dan sells pose no meaningful health or safety risks. As a result, it enacted fairly simple conditions on their sale,” said PLF Senior Attorney Larry Salzman. “A win for Dan means a win for you, or someone you know or love, with more competition, greater access, and lower costs in hearing care.”
The case is Taylor v. Polhill. As with all clients, PLF represents Dan Taylor free of charge.
Case CommentarySee all posts
Public land stewards reiterate that the President can reduce the size of national monuments
Briefing is now complete on the motion to dismiss Utah Diné Bikéyah v Trump, a case that challenges the President’s ability to reduce the size of national monuments PLF represents individuals and non-profit organizations that recreate, work, and volunteer on the public lands in Utah who were harmed when the Bears Ears National Monument was established This week, PLF filed another brief explaining the one president cannot bind future presidents when he establishes a national monument We are asking the court to dismiss the case A decision on the motion to dismiss is expected inRead more
This week six friend of the court briefs were filed asking the Supreme Court to hear Joe Robertson‘s Clean Water Act case. This is a very good showing for Joe’s … ›Read more