Press Release

PLF challenges abuse of foreclosure process to fatten public coffers

VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI;  February 27, 2017:  The full Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals should hear the constitutional takings lawsuit brought by several small property owners — including a financially struggling church — who were victimized by a Michigan law that lets local governments seize and sell people’s property for delinquent taxes and deposit the excess proceeds in government coffers instead of returning them to the owners.

So argues Pacific Legal Foundation in a just-filed petition asking the Sixth Circuit to grant en banc review in the case of Wayside Church v. Van Buren County .  Donor-supported PLF is the leading watchdog organization that litigates nationwide for limited government and property rights.  PLF represents all clients without charge.  The case is being litigated by PLF senior attorney J. David Breemer and PLF attorney Christina Martin.  They are assisted by three Michigan attorneys:  James Shek, based in Allegin, MI, and Ronald W. Ryan and Owen D. Ramey of Lewis, Reed & Allen PC in Kalamazoo.

The petitioners represented reflect a cross section of people owning property in Van Buren County, Michigan during the last recession.  Wayside Church (based in Chicago) owned and operated a parcel in Van Buren County as a youth camp.  Myron Stahl owned a residential lot where he was building his retirement home.  Henderson Hodgens owned a 20-acre farm with a home.

Michigan county exploited property owners’ hardships to enrich itself

All fell on hard times and were unable to pay their 2011 property taxes.  Van Buren County responded by invoking the Michigan General Property Tax Act to take and sell the properties.

In each case, the sale generated significantly more than the tax debt.  Wayside Church’s youth camp parcel was sold for $206,000, more than 12 times the tax debt of $16,750.  Stahl’s property was sold for $68,750 to cover a $25,000 debt.  Hodgens’s property sold for $47,750, compared to a $5,900 debt.  All told, the county garnered $274,850 in after-debt profits from the three sales.

But rather than simply keeping the amount needed to satisfy the tax debt and refunding the remainder to the original owners, the county pocketed the sale profits.

The litigation challenges this egregious self-enrichment as an unconstitutional taking of the owners’ private property, and specifically contends that the Michigan General Property Tax Act violates the Fifth Amendment by permitting such confiscation.  However, a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit, on a 2-1 vote, declined even to consider the property rights arguments.  Citing a controversial Supreme Court procedural precedent known as the Williamson County case, the two-judge majority held that such takings lawsuits must begin in state court, not federal courts.

Federal courts should not shrink from righting unconstitutional wrongs

“These plaintiffs have already been victimized enough by county bureaucrats,” said PLF attorney Christina Martin.  “They should not be victims of the judicial process as well by having the doors of the federal courts shut in their faces.  We are asking the full Sixth Circuit to hear this important property rights case, recognize that federal courts should be open and welcoming to people seeking to claim their federal constitutional rights, and issue a clear ruling that foreclosure can’t be abused to fatten public coffers by impoverishing struggling property owners.”

As an example of the hard times that have befallen the victims, the members of Wayside Church in Chicago suspend church meetings in winter months, because they cannot afford the heating bill for the building.  “It is so good to know that PLF is looking out for us and fighting for us,” said Reginald Hill, a church deacon.  “PLF is a real guardian of the people’s rights, and we are thankful.  We have faith that this matter will come to a just conclusion.”

The case is Wayside Church v. Van Buren County.  More information, including the petition for en banc review, is available at:  www.pacificlegal.org.

About Pacific Legal Foundation
Pacific Legal Foundation, America’s most powerful ally for justice, litigates in courts nationwide for limited government, property rights, and individual liberty.  PLF represents Wayside Church, Myron Stahl, and Henderson Hodgens free of charge, as with all its clients.

Case Attorneys

J. David Breemer

Senior Attorney

David (Dave) Breemer developed a passion for liberty while reading classics such as John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government and Thomas Paine’s The Rights of Man, as he pursued a … ›

View profile

Christina M. Martin

Attorney

Christina Martin is an attorney at PLF’s Florida office in Palm Beach Gardens. She litigates cases around the country to protect individual rights, property rights, and the rule of law.  … ›

View profile

Mark Miller

Senior Attorney

Mark Miller, a PLF Senior Attorney, manages PLF’s Florida office in Palm Beach Gardens. He litigates our constitutional rights in state and federal court. CBS This Morning, Fox & Friends, … ›

View profile

Case Commentary

See all posts
Post

By Kate A. Pomeroy

Michigan’s foreclosure law: Efficient or unfair?

Taylor Popielarz of ABC57 News  (South Bend, IN) aired a terrific segment that questions whether or not Michigan’s foreclosure law is “efficient or unfair” We think you’ll agree the law is unfair even if it allows the government to efficiently take your property it doesn’t deserve

As you will recall, since last year, Christina Martin has been keeping you up to date on Michigan’s unjust, and unconstitutional foreclosure law in Wayside Church v Van Buren County Before PLF took over the direct representation of the victims of this unfair law, including Wayside Church, it filed an amicus brief to support them in the US Court of

Read more
Post

By Christina M. Martin

Groups ask Supreme Court to grant PLF’s petition in Wayside Church v. Van Buren County

This week several groups filed “friend of the court” briefs supporting PLF’s Supreme Court petition in Wayside Church v Van Buren County

Two of the amicus briefs—one by AARP and the other by the Buckeye Institute—focus on the need for the Court to review Michigan’s unjust tax foreclosure law Under this unjust and unconstitutional law, Van Buren County took Wayside Church’s property, sold it for $206,000 to pay around $16,750 in property taxes, penalties, fees, and interest The County then pocketed all of the remaining profit as a windfall Similarly, the county took the farm and home where Henderson Hodgens grew up, and sold it for $47,750 to pay

Read more
Post

By Christina M. Martin

Michigan turns foreclosure into a government self-enrichment machine

Today, National Review published my article discussing, Wayside Church v Van Buren County, PLF’s case challenging legalized theft in Michigan Michigan’s unjust property tax law allows local governments to steal from people who fall behind on their property taxes As I explain in the article,

Can the government take your home and all your equity in it if you fall behind on your property taxes or — like many people in Flint, Mich — refuse to pay your water bill? The state of Michigan and a handful of other states think so These states’ odd tax laws allow counties to take and sell tax-delinquent properties and keep all the

Read more