Press Release

PLF’s Red Tape Rollback unveils new website

Just as critics of the CRA say door has closed, new website shows it’s wide open

ARLINGTON, VA;  May 23, 2017:  Red Tape Rollback, a project of Pacific Legal Foundation, is pleased to announce the launch of a newly redesigned website — www.redtaperollback.com.  After 20 years of limited use, the Congressional Review Act (CRA) was rediscovered as an effective means to overturn the worst “midnight” regulations of the Obama Administration. But legal scholars now say that it can eliminate even more rules from the Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations that are unlawfully in effect.

Watch this 3 minute video

Red Tape Rollback serves as the nation’s online platform for education about the CRA and this new legal theory, along with an interactive feature for the public to help find rules that were never submitted to Congress as the CRA requires.  The site includes the full text of the law; its legislative history; comprehensive information on how it can be used more effectively; resources for media; and a developing list of federal regulations — both recent and longstanding — that are vulnerable to congressional rejection under the CRA.

“The Congressional Review Act requires agencies to submit almost every rule or guidance document to Congress for review before it goes into effect, but that wasn’t done — hundreds of rules were not lawfully reported to Congress,” said Todd Gaziano, Senior Fellow in Constitutional Law at Pacific Legal Foundation, and project leader for Red Tape Rollback.  “There are hundreds of these burdensome, job killing illegal rules on the books that the Trump administration can modify or withdraw.  If some are sent to Congress now, they can also be reviewed and disapproved by Congress with the CRA’s expedited procedure.”

In recent weeks, many have said that the window to use the CRA to undo regulations has closed.  However, a coalition of liberty-minded public policy and legal organizations have joined forces to challenge that notion. Red Tape Rollback is advocating an expanded use of the Congressional Review Act — potentially paving the way for hundreds of rules to be reconsidered.

“We have already found many illegal rules that should have never been enforced, and now with our new website, visitors can help us by searching the Government Accountability Office’s database to identify unreported rules and submit them directly to us,” said Gaziano.

For more information on Red Tape Rollback, or to schedule an interview, please contact Collin Callahan at cbc@pacificlegal.org or (703) 647-4112.

About Pacific Legal Foundation
Pacific Legal Foundation, America’s most powerful ally for justice, litigates in courts nationwide for limited government, property rights, individual liberty, and a balanced approach to environmental regulations.

Case Commentary

See all posts
Post

By James S. Burling

Weekly litigation update — September 22, 2018

Ninth Circuit holds that permafrost is a navigable water

Today the Ninth Circuit in this opinion ruled against our clients in Tin Cup LLC v US Army Corps of Engineers Tin Cup, a family owned pipe fabrication business in North Pole, Alaska, sought to expand and relocate its business The Army Corps of Engineers claimed jurisdiction over the new property, claiming that the permafrost on the property was a navigable water within the meaning of the Clean Water Act But in 1993, Congress specifically directed the Corps to use a manual that makes permafrost not regulable under the Clean Water Act The Corps argued that it was not bound

Read more
Post

By Timothy R. Snowball

Here come the California speech police

While the United States has much to thank Great Britain for, including our common law system and our preference for coffee over tea, when it comes to modern politics the … ›

Read more
Post

By Brian T. Hodges

Do agency proceedings strip us of our constitutional rights?

The tendency for courts to broadly defer to agency decisions frustrates the judiciary’s core function as the adjudicative branch of government. Such deference also frustrates individual rights by sweeping constitutional … ›

Read more