This Court should not allow the political branches to devise a mechanism that allows them to escape Article II’s promise of political accountability.
July 02, 2026
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
[A]dministrative exhaustion should not be required for structural constitutional claims because it serves no institutional interests and the interests of the individual weigh heavily against such a requirement.
June 17, 2026
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
This Court should reaffirm that structural constitutional claims like those in Axon belong in federal district court. Doing so preserves the separation of powers and ensures that the Constitution’s structural guarantees remain more than empty promises.
June 08, 2026
Supreme Court of the United States
The Washington Supreme Court should review to reaffirm that agencies may not regulate through informal, binding directives.
April 10, 2026
Supreme Court of the State of Washington
If the challenged executive orders in the four underlying cases were allowed to stand, the precedent would jeopardize the ability of amici, and any other litigant, to seek redress in the courts from unlawful government infringement on individual rights. Such an outcome cannot be abided.
April 02, 2026
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit
After nearly a century of federal decisions routinely upholding what seem like unfettered delegations, it is imperative that this Court take a case to clarify that the nondelegation doctrine is alive and enforceable in the 21st century.
March 27, 2026
Supreme Court of the United States
[I]n deciding for itself whether ratification was a “disfavored” or “improper” sort of retroactivity, the Wille panel usurped Congress’s role. This panel should not follow suit.
March 10, 2026
Supreme Court of the United States
Courts must not help agencies to extend their powers beyond statutory and constitutional limits. But, for too long, agencies’ expansive views of their powers were assisted by judicial deference and acquiescence—at the expense of the people’s liberty and the rule of law.
March 02, 2026
Supreme Court of the United States
A constitutional protection that depends on a defendant’s willingness to incur additional financial and strategic exposure is illusory in practice. Article III and the Seventh Amendment require that the determination of liability for punitive monetary sanctions occur in court before a jury—not after the Executive has acted.
February 25, 2026
Supreme Court of the United States