David Latham filed a federal lawsuit challenging the USDA’s improperly appointed judicial officer and the agency-run tribunals that strip his right to a fair trial.
Fully Remote • Work from Anywhere in the U.S. You: A confident and entrepreneurial freedom fighter with a passion for battling onerous government. You’re looking for an opportunity to work with the best liberty lawyers in the nation, immerse yourself in the nuts-and-bolts of public-interest law, and study the legal and philosophical principles of the liberty movement. Them: Bureaucrats […]
Fifty-five years ago, Congress passed and President Richard Nixon signed the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) into law. For a number of infrastructure projects that are built, funded, or approved by the federal government, NEPA requires federal agencies to prepare an environmental impact statement, or EIS. That EIS is essentially a public r ...
Lawmakers across the country are proposing reparations to black Americans for slavery and America's history of racial discrimination. Proposals have included direct cash payments, grants, formal apologies from the government, and government programs with race-based eligibility. Because certain reparations proposals would inevitably advantage and ...
Dr. Wildern is suing in state courts to put LARA back in its proper constitutional lane and protect Michiganders’ right to work without unreasonable ideological training requirements.
Note: The photo above is of the Sacketts' Idaho property (marked by dotted line), which the EPA claimed was regulable as "navigable water." It's been nearly two years since the Supreme Court ruled for our clients, Chantell and Mike Sackett, in the landmark Clean Water Act case Sackett v. EPA. Yet the government still isn't complying with the jus ...
A West Virginia property owner is appealing a district court order allowing the EPA to ignore the Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. EPA and to unlawfully enforce the Clean Water Act.
Ron Foster is asking the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse the district court’s failure to apply the correct legal standard mandated by Sackett II.