A Florida case with national implications
Author: Timothy Sandefur
The Tampa Tribune today featured my article (coauthored with Steve Geiseler) on the Florida beach renourishment case:
America's Constitution requires states to pay "just compensation" when they take private property for the use of the public. But what if a state's judges simply declare that a person's ownership of property never existed in the first place? Is the person still entitled to just compensation – or can the state escape its duty to pay by mere say-so?
That's the question the U.S. Supreme Court will consider today when it hears a Florida property rights case with national implications. A group of beachfront homeowners from Destin are asking the justices to reverse a decision by Florida's highest court that erased legal protections that beach owners in Florida have relied on for almost a century
What to read next
PLF asks the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that there is no “legislative exception” to the unconstitutional conditions doctrine
It seems that some governments and courts prefer to treat Supreme Court precedent as an option, rather than a requirement. The Supreme Court has ruled—twice—that it’s unconstitutional for government to … ›