A Florida case with national implications
Author: Timothy Sandefur
The Tampa Tribune today featured my article (coauthored with Steve Geiseler) on the Florida beach renourishment case:
America's Constitution requires states to pay "just compensation" when they take private property for the use of the public. But what if a state's judges simply declare that a person's ownership of property never existed in the first place? Is the person still entitled to just compensation – or can the state escape its duty to pay by mere say-so?
That's the question the U.S. Supreme Court will consider today when it hears a Florida property rights case with national implications. A group of beachfront homeowners from Destin are asking the justices to reverse a decision by Florida's highest court that erased legal protections that beach owners in Florida have relied on for almost a century
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›