A quick correction for the recent MSNBC delta smelt story
A court-ordered protection of the Delta smelt, an endangered sliver of a fish, has reduced the amount of water farmers may use to 30 percent of their contracted amount. This means an estimated half million acres could be unplanted next season – the equivalent size of Rhode Island.
It is incorrect to state that the protections are “court-ordered.” The protections were ordered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, a federal agency purportedly acting under the Endangered Species Act, which in turn a law passed by the United States Congress. For more background on this subject, check out my 2010 post, “Who is to blame for the delta smelt saga?“
What to read next
Can the government designate your private property critical habitat for a species that can’t survive there?
Pacific Legal Foundation filed its Reply Brief today in Weyerhaeuser v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in this important … ›