Articles

The EPA and Army Corps asked for Clean Water Act recommendations. Here are ours.

April 01, 2025 | By CHARLES YATES

Note: The photo above is of the Sacketts' Idaho property (marked by dotted line), which the EPA claimed was regulable as "navigable water." It's been nearly two years since the Supreme Court ruled for our clients, Chantell and Mike Sackett, in the landmark Clean Water Act case Sackett v. EPA. Yet the government still isn't complying with the jus ...

Articles

Will the Supreme Court stop unconstitutional delegations of the taxing power?

March 28, 2025 | By CAMERON HALLING

The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in the case of FCC v. Consumers' Research, which involves a nondelegation challenge to the Telecommunications Act of 1996. PLF filed an amicus brief in the case—because the nondelegation doctrine, which says Congress cannot delegate its lawmaking responsibilities, is key to PLF's fight for the co ...

Articles

Ghost guns case shows justices seriously engaging with statutory text

March 27, 2025 | By ANASTASIA BODEN

The Supreme Court's ghost guns decision in Bondi v. Vanderstok centers on a fundamental question of American law: What happens when federal agencies reinterpret decades-old statutes to expand their own power? The justices considered whether, under the Gun Control Act of 1968, Congress authorized ATF to regulate gun parts kits—often called "ghost ...

Articles

Did President Trump break the law by firing FTC commissioners?

March 27, 2025 | By JOSH ROBBINS

On Tuesday, March 18, 2025, President Donald Trump summarily fired two Democratic members of the Federal Trade Commission. This would be an unremarkable occurrence at the start of a new presidential administration, except Congress restricted the president's ability to fire commissioners to instances of "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance ...

Articles

The Arizona Court of Appeals is not horsing around when it comes to agency adjudication

March 21, 2025 | By ASHLEY LEVINE

This week, the Arizona Court of Appeals closed the loop on the state's recent legislative mandate for de novo review of agency decisions, officially ending substantial-evidence deference to agency-found facts. In doing so, the court followed Pacific Legal Foundation's constitutional avoidance argument presented in our amicus brief and noted that bo ...

Articles

The Dispatch : Amy Coney Barrett Is Doing Her Job

March 19, 2025 | By ALISON SOMIN

"She's a big problem" blared a tweet featuring a photograph of Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Given the opposition she faced from Democratic senators and the broader left during her confirmation hearings in 2020, one might suspect that the post came from a progressive critic. But the post, which has been liked more than 117,000 times, w ...

Articles

Here’s the status of COVID-19 policies, 5 years later

March 18, 2025 | By NICOLE W.C. YEATMAN

The COVID-19 pandemic happened "gradually and then suddenly," to steal from Hemingway. In early 2020, the U.S. Commerce Secretary optimistically predicted that the coronavirus outbreak in China would "help to accelerate the return of jobs to North America." New York City's health commissioner encouraged New Yorkers "to go about their everyday lives ...

Articles

President Trump and Elon Musk are wrong to threaten judges with impeachment

March 18, 2025 | By ETHAN BLEVINS

DOGE has grand plans to shrink bureaucracy, but the ride has been bumpy. Those bumps include court decisions that have slowed the president's efforts to cut government waste. But frustrated DOGE fans should not forget that courts play a vital role in achieving DOGE's goal of limited government. For now, there is no love lost between DOGE and som ...

Articles

A deportation case that could affect your right to challenge government power

March 14, 2025 | By ALLISON DANIEL

On March 24, the Supreme Court will hear a case that, while technically about immigration, could affect every American's ability to challenge government overreach. At stake is whether people have a fair chance to challenge government decisions in court, or if procedural traps can block them from doing so. In Riley v. Garland, Pierre Riley is see ...