Coastal Commission Arguments

February 25, 2010 | By PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION

Author:  Paul Beard

Last week, the California Court of Appeal in Orange County heard argument in McNamee v. California Coastal Commission, with a decision expected in the next 90 days or so. 

The appeal challenges the California Coastal Commission’s denial of a permit allowing the McNamees to keep tables, benches and other beach amenities in their private backyard, which abuts a public beach.  The Commission denied the permit primarily on the grounds that the amenities were too bulky and out-of-character with the surrounding areas, and that the amenities hindered the public’s use of the public beach–grounds that constitute a misapplication of the relevant law and fly in the face of the facts in the record. 

Here’s a short summary of the case and argument:


The argument garnered substantial media attention in the Orange County Register, the Los Angeles Times, and even on Fox News’s Fox & Friends:

Finally, today, PLF attorney Dave Breemer had a hearing before the San Mateo County Superior Court in the closely watched case of Sterling v. California Coastal Commission.  The issue there is whether a family can be forced to farm as a condition of obtaining a permit to build a home on their land!  Watch our video summary of the case:

CASES AND COMMENTARY IN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM. SENT TO YOUR INBOX.

Subscribe to the weekly Docket for dispatches from the front lines.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.