One of the nation's biggest beneficiaries of eminent domain abuse, Wal-Mart, is on the other end this time, with a California city (see bottom of article) "plan[ning] to invoke the power of eminent domain to acquire a Wal-Mart owned lot to prevent the retailer from moving in."
This is an absurd use of the eminent domain power and shouldn't be condoned. But that doesn't mean it's improper to recognize, as Wal-Mart surely has, that the eminent domain sword has two edges.
What to read next
Can the government designate your private property critical habitat for a species that can’t survive there?
Pacific Legal Foundation filed its Reply Brief today in Weyerhaeuser v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in this important … ›