Endangered species delistings/downlistings!
Author: Reed Hopper
A few years ago, Pacific Legal Foundation filed suit to compel the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to conduct mandatory 5-year status reviews for more than 100 threatened or endangered species in the State of California. It was the largest lawsuit of its kind in the history of the Endangered Species Act and resulted in a settlement whereby the agency agreed to conduct the reviews in accordance with a court-approved schedule. After the completion of status reviews for some species in 2007-8, the Service concluded that 6 species, among others, should be reclassified. However, as is its practice, the Service took no action on its own recommendations.
In May, 2010, Pacific Legal Foundation petitioned the Service to reclassify the 6 species. Yesterday, the Service issued a finding that the petition may be warranted and has begun a new review of the species which will be concluded within 12 months. After that, the reclassificatons may be formally adopted.
The petition calls for the delisting of 2 protected plants; the Eureka Valley evening primrose and the Eureka Valley dunegrass. These plants are found in dune areas in Eureka Valley, Inyo County, and have recovered so as to no longer require the protections of the Act.
The petition also calls for the reclassification of 4 species from endangered to threatened. These include the Tidewater Goby, a small fish, found in brackish areas along the California Coast from Oregon to San Diego County. In 2008, the Service designated 10,000 acres of Critical Habitat for the goby in Del Norte, Humboldt, Mendocino, Sonoma, Marin, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Monterey, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura and Los Angeles Counties.
The San Clemente Island bush-mallow, the San Clemente Island broom, and the San Clemente Island Indian paintbrush, all plants, are endemic to San Clemente Island, and, like the goby, they have partially recovered and warrant "downlisting" to threatened status.
It is unfortunate that the Service must be brow beaten into doing its job and reviewing the status of listed species as the Act requires. But this is a step in the right direction.
What to read next
PLF asks the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that there is no “legislative exception” to the unconstitutional conditions doctrine
It seems that some governments and courts prefer to treat Supreme Court precedent as an option, rather than a requirement. The Supreme Court has ruled—twice—that it’s unconstitutional for government to … ›