Have federal wildlife regulators made Sophie's Choice?
Federal wildlife regulators have a legal responsibility to consider the impact of federal actions on endangered wildlife. That is their legal argument for their program to de-water the farms and communities of California’s San Joaquin Valley, by holding that water for endangered fish in the Sacramento Delta instead.
The Delta smelt, which were to benefit from the Valley’s engineered drought, continue to decline. And other endangered species, like the kit fox and the iconic California condor, which rely on irrigated Valley farms for habitat and other resources, are likely harmed by the Smelt protections. You can read more about it in my op ed in the Fresno Bee, and check out our short video below.
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›