Heritage on ESA stimulus riders
The Heritage Foundation's blog, the Foundry, has a couple of posts regarding the proposals to withdrawal the ESA Section 7 and polar bear/Section 4(d) rules, here and here. Heritage's Nick Loris suggests that:
withdrawing these ESA rules presents several opportunities for anti-energy activists to file administrative appeals and lawsuits by simply arguing carbon dioxide or any other greenhouse gas emissions are a threat to endangered species or its habitats. Thus, environmentalist activists can effectively block any new stimulus projects – quite contradictory to the stimulus plan’s objective to quickly create jobs and spending. In reality, it guarantees the stimulus money for investment projects will not be spent effectively.
What to read next
Originally published by The Hill, January 8, 2019. If you want to understand the importance of grassroots volunteers in a democracy, spend some time working political campaigns and party activities … ›