Is this the denouement of the salmon wars?
Author: Damien M. Schiff
On Monday, oral argument was heard in National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service, a decade-long lawsuit brought by environmentalists challenging the federal hydropower projects in the Pacific Northwest. The case boils down to whether the feds can come up with a plan to operate the dams in a way that does not impermissibly harm various populations of salmon, protected under the Endangered Species Act. (Recall that under Section 7 of the ESA, federal agencies must avoid taking any action that jeopardizes the continued existence of a listed species). The judge hearing the case, James Redden, has regularly ruled in favor of the environmentalists, and regardless of the administration. The judge has thrown out remedies from the Clinton and Bush administrations. Now, the Obama administration is advocating for judicial acceptance of the latest compromise plan (which does not, at least as of yet, advocate for dam breaching). Should the judge toss out that compromise, I don't think it would be too much of a stretch to anticipate some sort of legislative action.
What to read next
In February, eight Black and Hispanic families filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Connecticut State Department of Education’s race-based enrollment quotas for Hartford’s magnet schools. This policy mandates that 25% of a … ›
Don’t know how to identify every one of the 1,500 endangered species? This group wants to throw you in prison.
Ok, that’s a slight overstatement. But not as much of one as you would think. Activist group WildEarth Guardians apparently dreams of a world in which people can be thrown … ›