Kelo Was Not About "Judicial Activism"
by Timothy Sandefur
David Boaz of the Cato Institute has some excellent comments refuting the notion that the Kelo case was an instance of "judicial activism." The reality is, Kelo was a poster-child for "judicial restraint."conservatives cannot complain that the Kelo decision was another example of judges overriding the decisions of elected officials, which is their usual definition of 'judicial activism.' In this case, the judges lamentably deferred to local elected officials, ignoring the property rights protections in the Constitution. "
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›