Matt Sissel explains "why I'm taking a stand against Obamacare"
I’m simply an average man taking a stand. I’m a self-employed artist and small-business owner, living in Washington state. I have no political involvement or ambitions.
I am also a realist. The Supreme Court accepts very few of the cases that are petitioned to it.
But I am hopeful the justices will recognize the urgent issue at stake: Will the Origination Clause — a constitutional protection against reckless and arbitrary taxation — be repealed through the back door, by Congress ignoring it and courts failing to enforce it?
Obamacare isn’t just an unprecedented federal intrusion into our private lives and our personal health care decisions. It is also a voracious revenue-raising machine. All told, its scores of new taxes and fines will siphon more than $800 billion out of the economy over the next 10 years, according to Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation. The individual mandate alone will cost $55 billion over that period.
The Founders knew that the taxing authority can be “the power to destroy,” as Chief Justice John Marshall put it. The Origination Clause was meant to make that power accountable to the people, by requiring taxes to begin in the “people’s House.”
What to read next
Shed a (crocodile) tear for Luke Skywalker today, as Mark Hamill’s much ballyhooed Autograph Law is set to be undone and reformed by the same California officials who made the mistake to pass it in the first place. AB 228 has arrived at the Governor’s desk, and in all likelihood will be signed into law any day.
Our new flagship publication, Sword&Scales, offers 16 pages of news and information to bring you up close to the vital work of our legal team. Our ardent defense of the right to own and use private property takes center stage in the inaugural issue. It’s at the core of our mission in the nation’s courts.
On Thursday, in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, PLF filed this reply brief in support of its cert petition to the Supreme Court of the United States. In this case, we’re representing Minnesota voters in a First Amendment challenge to a ban on political apparel at polling places.
The Daily Journal published my column on California Cannabis Coalition v. City of Upland, recently decided by the California Supreme Court. As the op-ed points out, the ruling undermines Proposition 218’s requirements that all new taxes at the local level need voter approval.