more of the same
The New Yorker has joined the list of those who are critical of the proposed Endangered Species Act Section 7 regulations but who at the same time offer little substantive analysis of the proposed changes.
Considering that the ESA consists of a myriad of rules and prohibitions, it is hard to fathom how regulations pertaining to one provision of one section of the law could "effectively gut the Endangered Species Act." Perhaps that is why this prediction is left unexplained by the New Yorker.
What to read next
Don’t know how to identify every one of the 1,500 endangered species? This group wants to throw you in prison.
Ok, that’s a slight overstatement. But not as much of one as you would think. Activist group WildEarth Guardians apparently dreams of a world in which people can be thrown … ›
PLF scored another victory against bureaucratic overreach yesterday, when the federal court in Alaska dismissed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Congressional Review Act. This dismissal is PLF’s latest success … ›