"Nothing to see here!"
That's pretty much the Saganaw (MI) News's take on a property rights proposal on Michigan's ballots in November.
The arguments are nothing new, but they are presented here in a more-confusing-than-usual fashion. The odd reference to "[t]he so-called Kelo decision" is fairly representative.
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›