Obamacare: court grants PLF’s request to make Origination Clause arguments
The federal district court yesterday granted PLF’s motion to file our amended complaint in Sissel v. HHS, our case challenging the constitutionality of the “tax” on not having health insurance. As my colleague Paul Beard explains in this video, Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in the NFIB v. Sebelius case this summer recharacterized the PPACA’s financial penalty as a “tax,” which was enough for him to uphold its constitutionality—but it raised a new problem: the Constitution says that all “bills for raising revenue” must “originate in the House. Yet the PPACA did not originate in the House; it originated in the Senate. The Supreme Court has rarely addressed the Origination Clause, but now we are asking the D.C. District Court to rule that the tax on not having insurance violates the Constitution. You can read more about that case, and about our client, Matt Sissel, here.
What to read next
Our friends at Institute for Justice have convinced the Supreme Court to soon decide in the case Timbs v. Indiana whether the Constitution restrains states (and not just the federal government) from … ›
This morning the Ninth Circuit released this opinion in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, a case about whether California can demand confidential donor forms from nonprofit organizations operating within … ›