Obamacare's other assault on the Constitution: IPAB
Our friends Michael Cannon and Diane Cohen have an article in National Review Online today about the Independent Payment Advisory Board, one of the less famous assaults on constitutionalism included in the Obamacare legislation. As we pointed out last year, IPAB has been hailed by some of the Administration’s supporters as a group of “Platonic Guardians,” who are excited at the lawless power that IPAB will enjoy. Yet America’s founders made clear what they thought of “Platonic Guardians,” when they created a constitutional system with legal limits and democratic controls. PLF has joined the constitutional challenge to IPAB with this brief in Coons v. Geithener, a lawsuit that’s currently on hold in the Arizona Federal District Court. You can learn more about IPAB here.
What to read next
Shed a (crocodile) tear for Luke Skywalker today, as Mark Hamill’s much ballyhooed Autograph Law is set to be undone and reformed by the same California officials who made the mistake to pass it in the first place. AB 228 has arrived at the Governor’s desk, and in all likelihood will be signed into law any day.
Our new flagship publication, Sword&Scales, offers 16 pages of news and information to bring you up close to the vital work of our legal team. Our ardent defense of the right to own and use private property takes center stage in the inaugural issue. It’s at the core of our mission in the nation’s courts.
On Thursday, in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, PLF filed this reply brief in support of its cert petition to the Supreme Court of the United States. In this case, we’re representing Minnesota voters in a First Amendment challenge to a ban on political apparel at polling places.
The Daily Journal published my column on California Cannabis Coalition v. City of Upland, recently decided by the California Supreme Court. As the op-ed points out, the ruling undermines Proposition 218’s requirements that all new taxes at the local level need voter approval.