PLF: "All-star" impact in the Supreme Court
SCOTUSBlog has announced the results of its survey of the impact of friend-of-the-court briefs by organizations across the country. We’re very proud to learn that Pacific Legal Foundation ranks third in the nation, and first among constitutionally-oriented organizations in terms of its influence at the “cert. stage.”
Here’s what that means: unlike the lower appellate courts, the Supreme Court isn’t required to hear a case. Instead, you have to ask it to do so. When you ask the Court to take a case—called petitioning for a writ of certiorari, or “cert.”—other folks can file these friend-of-the-court briefs recommending that the Court agree to hear a matter. We file these briefs in support of cert. when we think a case is particularly important, and 20 percent of the time the Court agrees and takes the case. That’s a pretty good average, considering that the Supreme Court only takes about one percent of all the cases they’re ask to hear annually.
People sometimes question the value of these friend-of-the-court briefs, and sometimes they aren’t very helpful. But we work hard to ensure that we file hard-hitting, well-researched, legally solid briefs that advance principled arguments for individual rights, racial equality, and limited government. We’re honored to see that our efforts are making a real impact and are helping to shape constitutional law nationwide.
What to read next
PLF asks the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that there is no “legislative exception” to the unconstitutional conditions doctrine
It seems that some governments and courts prefer to treat Supreme Court precedent as an option, rather than a requirement. The Supreme Court has ruled—twice—that it’s unconstitutional for government to … ›