Polar bear saga continues … Part 2
Two weeks ago, we filed a petition in the D.C. Circuit Court asking the en banc court to rehear the panel decision that upheld the listing of the polar bear as a threatened species. That petition outlined three major errors in the panel’s decision: (1) that the Fish and Wildlife Service did not properly account for foreign conservation efforts; (2) that the Service did not explain how the polar bear satisfied the statutory definition for “threatened;” and, (3) that the Service used an improper standard in determining harm to the species. Yesterday, the court denied the rehearing request. This case will now be petitioned to the U.S. Supreme Court.
What to read next
Yesterday, PLF filed comments on Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) proposed amendments to the Greater Sage-Grouse Resource Management Plans in Colorado, Idaho, Oregon, Nevada and Northeastern Californian, Utah, and Wyoming. … ›
Washington State boasts one of the most protective constitutions in the nation. Among its unique provisions, the Uniformity Clause protects individuals from discriminatory taxation by requiring that any taxes be … ›