President's weekly report — December 21, 2012
We had a number of decisions come down this week, presumably part of the rush to get these in before the end of world later today.
Individual Rights — First Amendment
On Thursday, a the Ninth Circuit overturned a federal district court ruling and upheld the City of San Diego’s low-cost leases (including at Balboa Park) to the Boy Scouts of America. In Barnes-Wallace v. City of San Diego. The Court rejected claims that, because of Boy Scout policies on religion, the leases violate the First Amendment ban on establishment of religion. The court noted — in accord with the amicus brief from Pacific Legal Foundation and the Veterans of Foreign Wars — that the city leases property, mostly at little or no cost, to more than 120 nonprofits in all, both secular and religious. So a reasonable observer could not see an endorsement of religion when the Scouts’ lease is viewed in that broad context.
Environmental Review — California Environmental Quality Act
We filed an amicus brief in Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores) in support of a petition for review at the California Supreme Court. Under California law, when the voters pass an initiative allowing for a particular land use, there is no requirement to file an Environmental Impact Report. Also under California law, if enough voters sign petitions to put a land use approval on the ballot, a city may save time and money by adopting theproposed initiative as an ordinance. That too should be exempt from the EIR requirement. But a court of appeal panel held otherwise and will not permit Wal-Mart to proceed with a new store despite a voter initiative that received enough signatures to prompt the City to adopt a land use change for Wal-Mart.
Free Enterprise Project — Equal Opportunity Under the Law
We had previously filed an amicus brief in Blessing v. Sirius XM Radio objecting to an order requiring “diversity” in class counsel in this class action case. This week, the Second Circuit ruled that plaintiffs who objected to a class certification did not suffer any injury from the lower court’s diversity order, and therefore lacked standing.
Environment — Endangered Species
In Bonner County. v. Salazar, we received a positive initial finding on our delisting petition for the Selkirk caribou. The official announcement was published in the Fed Reg on Wednesday.
Free Enterprise Project — Tort Reform
Should a person injured by exposure to asbestos be able to sue a manufacturer of products containing asbestos even if he cannot prove that he ever inhaled asbestos fibers from those products? Pacific Legal Foundation doesn’t think so. That’s why this week we filed this brief in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Howard v. A.W. Chesterton. Inc.‘
learn more about
Bonner County v. Zinke
For decades, citizens of Bonner County, Idaho and members of the Idaho State Snowmobile Association have endured profound negative effects from the federal government’s listing of the Southern Selkirk Mountain caribou population. The local economy depends heavily on winter recreational activities that are significantly limited by trail closures related to the caribou. Over three years ago, the government acknowledged the caribou was not endangered and should never have been listed in the first place. And then it did…. nothing. The Endangered Species Act requires action within certain deadlines to delist species, and the government ignored all of them. PLF represents the residents of Bonner County and the snowmobilers in a lawsuit to force the government to follow the law and delist the caribou.Read more
What to read next
This past week Cato Institute, Southeastern Legal Foundation, and the NFIB Small Business Legal Center filed amicus briefs supporting our Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Ganson v. City of Marathon regulatory takings case. … ›
California has now rescinded the state’s onerous “certificate of authenticity” requirement for the sale of autographed books. Hear directly from Bill and case attorney Anastasia Boden about the impact of this victory for freedom, common sense, and Bill’s right to be an upstanding small business owner.
One of the most fundamental rights of American citizens is the right to seek redress from illegal government action in a court of law. But the federal government has an arsenal of weapons it wields to deny or curtail this right. Nowhere is this more prevalent than in the government’s attempts to stifle landowner suits challenging federal agency action under the Clean Water Act.