In 2001, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) asserted the power to prohibit road maintenance, road construction, and timber harvest across the national forests, locking away 58.5 million acres of American forests—an area roughly the size of Wyoming—without congressional authorization. That assertion of power became the “Roadless Rule.”
Learn more about Pacific Legal Foundation’s work to challenge the Roadless Rule here.
All 34 entries, 1998–2026, with descriptions and primary sources. Select an entry to read more.
34 of 34 entries
The U.S. Forest Service Chief announces plans to develop a transportation policy for the National Forest System. He also proposes an 18-month road building moratorium on 130 National Forests while the policy is developed.
Sources: 63 Fed. Reg. 4,350–4,351 (Jan. 28, 1998); 63 Fed. Reg. 4,351–4,354 (Jan. 28, 1998)
A temporary roadbuilding moratorium takes effect.
Sources: 64 Fed. Reg. 7,290–7,305 (Feb. 12, 1999) (effective Mar. 1, 1999)
The USDA publishes the Roadless Area Conservation Rule, generally prohibiting road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting on 58.5 million acres of undeveloped national forest lands, subject to exceptions.
Sources: 66 Fed. Reg. 3,244, 3,245, 3,272–3,273 (Jan. 12, 2001)
In accordance with President Bush’s Regulatory Review Plan, the Roadless Rule is delayed for an additional 60 calendar days.
Sources: 66 Fed. Reg. 8,899 (Feb. 5, 2001)
Idaho Federal Judge Edward Lodge issues a preliminary injunction barring the Roadless Rule from taking effect.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reverses Judge Lodge’s preliminary injunction, reinstating the Roadless Rule.
Sources: Kootenai Tribe of Idaho v. Veneman, 313 F.3d 1094, 1126 (9th Cir. 2002)
The Bush Administration announces it will settle a lawsuit brought by the State of Alaska by agreeing to propose a temporary exemption for the Tongass National Forest. Separately, it announces it will consider whether the Tongass and Chugach National Forests should be exempted from the Roadless Rule.
Sources: U.S. Dep’t of Agric., Release No. 0200.03 (June 9, 2003); see also 68 Fed. Reg. 75,136, 75,136–75,137 (Dec. 30, 2003)
Wyoming Federal Court Judge Clarence Brimmer finds the Roadless Rule illegal and issues an injunction barring it from taking effect.
Sources: Wyoming v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 277 F. Supp. 2d 1197, 1239 (D. Wyo. 2003)
USDA publishes a final rule temporarily exempting the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Rule.
The Tongass exemption takes effect.
Sources: 68 Fed. Reg. 75,136 (Dec. 30, 2003) (effective Jan. 29, 2004)
The Bush Administration announces the State Petitions Rule as a substitute for the Roadless Rule, allowing governors to petition for state-specific management requirements.
Sources: 70 Fed. Reg. 25,654–25,662 (May 13, 2005) (signed May 5, 2005)
The Bush Administration approves petitions from the governors of three Eastern states—Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina—concerning state-specific roadless protections for roughly 555,000 acres of forested land within their borders.
Federal District Court Judge Elizabeth Laporte in San Francisco orders reinstatement of the Clinton-era Roadless Rule for almost 50 million acres of national forests and grasslands, generally restricting road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting, subject to exceptions.
Judge Laporte issues a final injunction, clarifying its application to certain post-May 2005 oil-and-gas authorizations.
Wyoming Federal District Court Judge Brimmer issues a second decision, very similar to his 2003 decision, invalidating and enjoining the Roadless Rule nationwide.
Sources: Wyoming v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 570 F. Supp. 2d 1309, 1354–1355 (D. Wyo. 2008)
The Forest Service adopts the Idaho Roadless Rule.
Judge Laporte partially stays her injunction, limiting geographic scope to the Ninth Circuit and New Mexico.
Colorado and Administration officials agree to postpone action on the proposed Colorado Roadless Rule until spring 2009.
Sources: Colorado Secures Delay in Implementation of Roadless Management Plan, Am. Whitewater (Dec. 5, 2008)
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upholds Roadless Rule restrictions affecting over 40 million acres of national forests and grasslands, generally limiting road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting.
Sources: California ex rel. Lockyer v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 575 F.3d 999, 1021 (9th Cir. 2009)
The Obama Administration extends for another year a requirement that certain road construction, road reconstruction, and timber cutting or removal decisions in inventoried roadless areas be reserved to the Secretary of Agriculture.
Idaho District Court upholds the Idaho Roadless Rule.
Alaska District Court vacates the 2003 Tongass exemption and reinstates the Roadless Rule on the Tongass.
Sources: Organized Village of Kake v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 776 F. Supp. 2d 960, 976–977 (D. Alaska 2011)
The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals reverses the Wyoming District Court and directs that the prior injunction be vacated.
Sources: Wyoming v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 661 F.3d 1209, 1272 (10th Cir. 2011)
The Forest Service adopts the Colorado Roadless Rule.
A divided panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reverses the 2011 Alaska District Court decision by a 2–1 split vote, reviving the Tongass exemption.
Sources: Organized Village of Kake v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 746 F.3d 970 (9th Cir. 2014)
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit announces it will re-hear the case challenging the Tongass exemption. The court grants the rehearing en banc, rendering the earlier opinion ineffective.
Sources: Organized Village of Kake v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 765 F.3d 1117 (9th Cir. 2014)
The Ninth Circuit’s 11-judge en banc panel rules that the exemption of the Tongass from the Roadless Rule was invalid under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Sources: Organized Village of Kake v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 795 F.3d 956, 966–970 (9th Cir. 2015) (en banc)
Alaska and the Forest Service enter an agreement as cooperating agencies for an Alaska roadless rulemaking after Alaska petitioned for a Tongass exemption.
Sources: Memorandum of Understanding Between the State of Alaska and USDA Forest Service (Aug. 2, 2018)
The Trump Administration publishes a final rule exempting the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Rule.
The U.S. Forest Service formally reinstates the 2001 Roadless Rule management regime across the Tongass National Forest, reimposing restrictions on road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting, subject to exceptions, across about 9.37 million acres of land.
Represented by Pacific Legal Foundation, Inside Passage Electric Cooperative and Alaska Power Association file suit against USDA after the agency’s January 2023 decision reinstating the 2001 Roadless Rule on the Tongass National Forest. The USDA lacked statutory authority to reimpose the rule, and the restrictions impede hydroelectric, geothermal, and other infrastructure projects that require road access.
On his first day in office, President Trump signs an executive order directing the Secretary of Agriculture to reinstate the 2020 Alaska Roadless Rule’s exemption for the Tongass.
Sources: Exec. Order No. 14,153, § 3(c), 90 Fed. Reg. 8,347, 8,350 (Jan. 29, 2025) (signed Jan. 20, 2025)
Agriculture Secretary Rollins announces USDA’s intention to rescind the 2001 Roadless Rule, and USDA begins the formal rulemaking process.
Sources: U.S. Dep’t of Agric., Secretary Rollins Rescinds Roadless Rule, Eliminating Impediment to Responsible Forest Management (June 23, 2025); see also 90 Fed. Reg. 42,179 (Aug. 29, 2025)
The U.S. Forest Service publishes a proposed rule and environmental review for rescinding the Roadless Rule.
Sources: 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827–53,832 (Aug. 20, 2026); see also 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026) (extending comment period)
Timeline adapted from Earthjustice’s “Timeline of the Roadless Rule,” checked against the primary sources linked in each entry. As of Oct. 2026. This timeline is reproduced from the accompanying visualization.