Supreme Court denies cert in The New 49'ers
In Karuk Tribe of California v. United States Forest Service, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the receipt of a notice of intent from a private party is an “agency action,” triggering the consultation requirement of the Endangered Species Act. The miners sought review in the Supreme Court, and Pacific Legal Foundation, representing several mining groups, supported the miners’ petition with an amicus brief. PLF’s brief argued that the decision was inconsistent with National Association of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife, a Supreme Court case holding that the ESA’s consultation requirement only applies when an agency exercises discretionary authority.
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court denied the cert petition this morning. As a result, the question of which private activities qualify as “agency actions” will likely be the subject of continuing controversy.
What to read next
Don’t know how to identify every one of the 1,500 endangered species? This group wants to throw you in prison.
Ok, that’s a slight overstatement. But not as much of one as you would think. Activist group WildEarth Guardians apparently dreams of a world in which people can be thrown … ›
PLF scored another victory against bureaucratic overreach yesterday, when the federal court in Alaska dismissed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Congressional Review Act. This dismissal is PLF’s latest success … ›