Texas Supreme Court will consider case about what “rational basis” means
The Texas Supreme Court has announced that it will consider the case of Patel v. Department of Licensing, which raises the issue of what the “rational basis” test means under Texas state constitutional law.
Rational basis, of course, is the test that judges use when deciding whether a restriction on economic freedom is constitutional or not. This test is typically biased very heavily in favor of the government, allowing bureaucrats to do practically anything they want when it comes to economic matters or private property rights. But Texas state courts are a little different. They’ve applied a more rigorous kind of legal scrutiny rather than the rubber-stamp, anything-goes rational basis test that is usually applied in today’s federal courts. Pacific Legal Foundation filed this brief back in November urging the Texas Supreme Court to take up this issue and declare once and for all that under state law, the right to earn a living will receive meaningful judicial protection.
The court has set a hearing for February 27.
What to read next
PLF asks the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that there is no “legislative exception” to the unconstitutional conditions doctrine
It seems that some governments and courts prefer to treat Supreme Court precedent as an option, rather than a requirement. The Supreme Court has ruled—twice—that it’s unconstitutional for government to … ›