The Kelo Revolt
The Wall Street Journal comments on the Ohio Supreme Court's repudiation of private takings of land.
In her opinion for a unanimous court this week, Ohio Supreme Justice Maureen O'Connor wrote, "For the individual property owner, the appropriation is not simply the seizure of a house. It is the taking of a home — the place where ancestors toiled, where families were raised, where memories were made."
Wednesday's ruling means Carl and Joy Gamble and Joe Horney can stay in their homes, and Matthew and Sanae Ichikawa Burton won't have to move their business. Susette Kelo, the loser in last year's U.S. Supreme Court case, wasn't so lucky. But at least her pink cottage on the New London, Connecticut, waterfront won't be bulldozed. In an agreement reached last month with the city, her house will be relocated to make way for condos.
What to read next
Can the government designate your private property critical habitat for a species that can’t survive there?
Pacific Legal Foundation filed its Reply Brief today in Weyerhaeuser v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in this important … ›