The Obama Administration’s legal theory of the day: now it’s not a tax
You’ll remember that supporters of the Individual Mandate at first conceded that it was not a tax…and then changed their minds when some judges showed an interest in it, and ruled that the Mandate is a tax, so that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review its constitutionality. Today, however, Jeffrey Zients, acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, testified before Congress that it’s not a tax. Now, I think this is good news. There are 40 days between today and March 26th, when the Supreme Court considers the question of whether the Mandate is a tax, and whether they have jurisdiction. Assuming the Administration switches its position back and forth each day, I calculate that the Individual Mandate will not be a tax on the day of the oral argument. Phew!
What to read next
PLF asks the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that there is no “legislative exception” to the unconstitutional conditions doctrine
It seems that some governments and courts prefer to treat Supreme Court precedent as an option, rather than a requirement. The Supreme Court has ruled—twice—that it’s unconstitutional for government to … ›