US Supreme Court hears data-mining censorship case
Author: Deborah J. La Fetra
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in ??Sorrell v. IMS Health, on the issue of whether a Vermont law that prohibits pharmacies from selling prescription data to data mining companies that then sell information to pharmaceutical companies violates the First Amendment. Vermont was very clear that its purpose was to reduce the ability of drug companies to efficiently market new, brand-name drugs, in the hopes that doctors would be more likely to choose cheaper, generic drugs based on the reduced information. PLF filed an amicus brief on behalf of itself and the Cato Institute in the case. We expect a decision sometime in June. You can download a copy of PLF's brief by clicking on the following link: Download Sorrell.
What to read next
PLF asks the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that there is no “legislative exception” to the unconstitutional conditions doctrine
It seems that some governments and courts prefer to treat Supreme Court precedent as an option, rather than a requirement. The Supreme Court has ruled—twice—that it’s unconstitutional for government to … ›